The dialogues of Plato in five volumes, Vol. 2 (of 5) : $b Translated into English with analyses and introductionsPlato
PhilosophyPhilosophy
The dialogues of Plato in five volumes, Vol. 2 (of 5) : $b Translated into English with analyses and introductions
Plato
Dialogues, Greek -- Translations into English; Philosophy, Ancient
Euthyphro, who, in the abundance of his knowledge, is very
willing to undertake all the responsibility, replies: That piety is
doing as I do, prosecuting your father (if he is guilty) on a charge
of murder; doing as the gods do—as Zeus did to Cronos, and
Cronos to Uranus.
Socrates has a dislike to these tales of mythology, and he fancies 6
that this dislike of his may be the reason why he is charged with
impiety. ‘Are they really true?’ ‘Yes, they are;’ and Euthyphro
will gladly tell Socrates some more of them. But Socrates
would like first of all to have a more satisfactory answer to the
question, ‘What is piety?’ ‘Doing as I do, charging a father with
murder,’ may be a single instance of piety, but can hardly be
regarded as a general definition.
Euthyphro replies, that ‘Piety is what is dear to the gods, 7
and impiety is what is not dear to them.’ But may there not
be differences of opinion, as among men, so also among the
gods? Especially, about good and evil, which have no fixed
rule; and these are precisely the sort of differences which
give rise to quarrels. And therefore what may be dear to one 8
god may not be dear to another, and the same action may
be both pious and impious; e. g. your chastisement of your
father, Euthyphro, may be dear or pleasing to Zeus (who inflicted
a similar chastisement on his own father), but not
equally pleasing to Cronos or Uranus (who suffered at the
hands of their sons).
Euthyphro answers that there is no difference of opinion, either
among gods or men, as to the propriety of punishing a murderer.
Yes, rejoins Socrates, when they know him to be a murderer; but
you are assuming the point at issue. If all the circumstances of
the case are considered, are you able to show that your father 9
was guilty of murder, or that all the gods are agreed in approving
of our prosecution of him? And must you not allow that what
is hated by one god may be liked by another? Waiving this last,
however, Socrates proposes to amend the definition, and say that
‘what all the gods love is pious, and what they all hate is impious.’
To this Euthyphro agrees.
[Sidenote: _Analysis 9-15._]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account