The Diamond Sutra (Chin-Kang-Ching) or Prajna-ParamitaUnknown
Religion
The Diamond Sutra (Chin-Kang-Ching) or Prajna-Paramita
Unknown
Buddhism; Buddhism -- Sacred books
“If the pool be of pure water, the shining moon is reflected upon
its limpid surface; and yet we cannot affirm that the moon really
came from anywhere, or that it is actually in the pool. If the
pool be disturbed and the dense mud raised, immediately the bright
reflection becomes obscured; and yet we dare not affirm that the
moon has really gone to anywhere, or that it has actually departed
from the pool. It is entirely a question of the purity or impurity
of the water, and has no reasonable affinity with theories
concerning the existence or non-existence of the moon. So, also,
with the true concept of Buddha; only those whose minds are
immaculate in their pristine purity, can ever realise his
transcendent blessedness.”—_Chang-Shui_ (a Chinese monk).
[Chapter 30]
The Lord Buddha addressed Subhuti, saying: “If a good disciple,
whether man or woman, were to take infinite worlds and ‘reduce’ them
to minute particles of dust; what think you, would the aggregate of
all those particles of dust be great?” Subhuti replied, saying:
“Honoured of the Worlds! the aggregate of all those particles of dust
would be exceedingly great. And why? Because, if all those were in
reality ‘minute particles of dust,’ the Lord Buddha would not have
declared them to be ‘minute particles of dust.’ And why? Because, the
Lord Buddha, discoursing upon ‘minute particles of dust,’ declared
that in reality those are not ‘minute particles of dust,’ they are
merely termed ‘minute particles of dust.’”[1]
Subhuti continuing, addressed the Lord Buddha, saying: “Honoured of
the Worlds! what the Lord Buddha discoursed upon as ‘infinite worlds,’
these are not in reality ‘infinite worlds,’ they are merely termed
‘infinite worlds.’ And why? Because, if these were in reality
‘infinite worlds,’ there would of necessity be unity and eternity of
matter. But the Lord Buddha, discoursing upon the ‘unity and eternity
of matter,’ declared that there is neither ‘unity’ nor ‘eternity of
matter,’ therefore it is merely termed ‘unity and eternity of matter.’”
The Lord Buddha thereupon declared unto Subhuti, “Belief in the unity
or eternity of matter is incomprehensible;[2] and only common,
worldly-minded people, for purely materialistic reasons, covet this
hypothesis.”
[1] These minute particles of dust, like the great worlds which
are composed of them, are deceptive forms of natural phenomena,
equally unreal and evanescent. The minute particles which we
observe floating in space, are carried hither and thither by
atmospheric currents, and eventually pass into regions beyond our
cognisance. So, also, with the immense worlds revolving in space;
their ever-recurring phenomena of light and darkness, heat and
cold, changing seasons, transient scenes of mountain and valley,
river and plain. These things indicate that all are ephemeral, and
entirely subject to irrevocable laws of change and decay.—_Chinese
Annotation_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account