The Diplomatic Correspondence of the American Revolution, Vol. 02
History
The Diplomatic Correspondence of the American Revolution, Vol. 02
United States -- Foreign relations -- 1775-1783; United States -- History -- Revolution, 1775-1783 -- Sources
I have the honor to be, &c.
ARTHUR LEE.
[44] In a letter to Mr Lovell, one of the Committee of Foreign Affairs,
dated June 2d, 1779, Dr Franklin writes as follows.
“I have never meddled with the dispute between
him (Mr Deane) and Mr Lee, but the suspicion
of having a good will to him has drawn upon me
a great deal of ill will from his antagonist.
The Congress have wisely enjoined the Ministers
in Europe to agree with one another. I had
always resolved to have no quarrel, and have,
therefore, made it a constant rule to answer no
angry, affronting, or abusive letters, of which
I have received many and long ones from Mr Lee
and Mr Izard, who, I understand, and see by the
papers, have been writing liberally, or rather
illiberally, against me, to prevent, as one
of them says here, any impressions my writing
against them might occasion to their prejudice.
But I have never before mentioned them in any of
my letters.”
BENJAMIN FRANKLIN TO ARTHUR LEE.
Passy, March 13th, 1779.
Sir,
A severe fit of the gout, with too much business at the same time
necessary to be done, has prevented till now my answering yours of
the 21st past.
I did not imagine there would be any difference of sentiment between
us concerning the propriety of returning to me the papers, which
you have at various times taken from this house. When several
persons joined in the same commission are to act upon papers, it
seems necessary that they should be lodged in one place, where all
the parties may be sure of finding them, and under the care of one
person, who should be accountable for them; and if there were not
some particular reasons to influence another choice, I should suppose
the first person named in the commission might with great propriety
take charge of them; I am sure that if you had been that person I
should have made no objection to it. Mr Adams having a room more
convenient and more private than mine, and in which he lodged, I
approved of his having the papers. He has voluntarily returned me
all he had without asking, and I thought asking was only necessary
to obtain the rest from you; for the whole business, which before
was transacted by us jointly, being now devolved on me, and as there
must be frequent occasion to look back on letters received, memorials
delivered, and accounts given in, contracts made, &c. &c. which,
if I cannot have the opportunity of doing, I must be frequently at
a loss in future transactions, I did not imagine I should have any
difficulty in obtaining them, nor had I the least idea that my asking
for them would occasion any dispute.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account