The Diplomatic Correspondence of the American Revolution, Vol. 02
History
The Diplomatic Correspondence of the American Revolution, Vol. 02
United States -- Foreign relations -- 1775-1783; United States -- History -- Revolution, 1775-1783 -- Sources
The support which he required
was a letter from the Commissioners, addressed to all such captains
of ships as were in the service of the United States, informing them,
that he was an agent properly authorised by Congress to manage their
commercial concerns in this country, and that it would be proper for
them to follow his instructions. This request, which appeared to me
extremely reasonable, was to my astonishment rejected both by you and
Mr Deane.
This appeared the more extraordinary to me, as you both acknowledged,
that you were perfectly convinced of the truth of what Mr Lee had
stated to you, and said you had laid these abuses before Congress,
and complained in the strongest terms against Mr Thomas Morris, whose
misconduct had occasioned some of them; that Congress had given you
a tacit reproof, by taking no notice of the complaints you had made,
and that Mr Robert Morris, a member of the committee for foreign
affairs, had given you _a rap over the knuckles_ for having made
them. I begged you to consider that the silence of Congress, which
you had construed into a reproof, might have been occasioned by the
multiplicity of business they had to transact, or they might have
attended to it, and their letter on the subject have miscarried.
This you said could not have been the case, as the complaints to
Congress against Mr Morris made but part of your letter; there were
several other matters contained in it, which were all answered, and
as the complaint against Mr Morris was the only part unnoticed, you
considered it as a reproof to you for having written to Congress
about it. You had attempted once to correct the abuses, which every
body knew were practising at Nantes to a very scandalous degree.
Mr Robert Morris had misrepresented your good intentions, and
had insinuated in his letter to Mr Deane of June 29th, that your
complaints against his brother were made from interested motives,
and that you wished him removed to make way for your nephew. As your
conduct had in one instance, relative to the abuses at Nantes, been
thus misrepresented, you were determined it should in no other, by
adhering to your resolution of not meddling with them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account