The Diplomatic Correspondence of the American Revolution, Vol. 04
History
The Diplomatic Correspondence of the American Revolution, Vol. 04
United States -- Foreign relations -- 1775-1783; United States -- History -- Revolution, 1775-1783 -- Sources
3. In blending the business of a public Minister with that of a
commercial agent. The business of various departments is by this means
so blended, and the public and private expenses so confounded with
each other, that I am sure no satisfaction can ever be given to the
public of the disposition of their interests, and I am very confident,
that jealousies and suspicions will hereafter arise against the
characters of gentlemen, who may, perhaps, have acted with perfect
integrity and the fairest intentions for the public good.
My idea is this; separate the offices of public Ministers from those
of commercial agents;[37] recall, or send to some other Court, all
the public Ministers but one at this Court; determine with precision
the sum that shall be allowed to the remaining one for his expenses,
for his salary, and for his time, risk, trouble, &c.; and when this is
done, see that he receives no more than his allowance. The
inconveniences arising from the multiplicity of Ministers and the
complication of business are infinite.
Remember me with the most tender affection to my worthy colleagues,
and to all others to whom you know they are due.
I am your friend and servant,
JOHN ADAMS.
FOOTNOTES:
[36] In another letter, which Mr Adams afterwards wrote to Mr Samuel
Adams, he says the account of the Commissioners' expenses here given
is "exaggerated," and "put much too high," owing to his having been
but a short time in Paris, and not being accurately informed on the
subject. See this letter hereafter, dated February 14th, 1779, in the
present volume.
By a letter from Mr Arthur Lee, dated May 9th, 1778, containing a
transcript from the banker's books, it appears, that from December,
1776, to March, 1778, a period of fifteen months, Silas Deane received
on his private account, $20,926; Arthur Lee, $12,749; and Dr Franklin,
$12,214. _See Arthur Lee's Correspondence_, Vol. II. p. 159, where the
above sums are stated in livres, and they are here reduced to dollars
by the rule practised at that time, of allowing five livres and eight
sols to the dollar. The fractions are omitted in the reduction. It
must be observed, that the above payments are not a specification of
the amounts actually received for the period in question, because the
Commissioners may have had other expenses for which they afterwards
drew on the banker, but these sums may serve as a tolerably correct
indication of their expenses, and were probably intended as such by Mr
Lee. At this time no fixed salary was allowed, but Congress resolved
that all expenses should be paid, and that such an additional
compensation should be granted, as might afterwards be deemed
expedient by Congress.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account