The Diplomatic Correspondence of the American Revolution, Vol. 05
History
The Diplomatic Correspondence of the American Revolution, Vol. 05
United States -- Foreign relations -- 1775-1783; United States -- History -- Revolution, 1775-1783 -- Sources
It will be said, that the faith of society ought to be sacred, and
that the Congress have pledged the public faith for the redemption of
the bills, at the value on the face of them. I agree that the public
faith ought to be sacred. But who is it that has violated this faith?
Is it not every man, who has demanded more paper money for his labor
or his goods than they were worth in silver? The public faith, in the
sense these words are here used, would require that Congress should
make up to every man, who for five years past has paid more in paper
money for anything he has purchased, than he could have had it for in
silver. The public faith is no more pledged to the present possessor
of the bills, than it is to every man, through whose hands they may
have passed, at a less value than the nominal value. So that according
to this doctrine, Congress would have two hundred millions of dollars
to pay to the present possessors of the bills, and to make up to every
man, through whose hands they may have passed, the difference at which
they passed between them and silver.
It should be considered, that every man, whether native or foreigner,
who receives or pays this money at a less value than the nominal
value, breaks this faith. For the social compact being between the
whole and every individual, and between every individual and the
whole, every individual, native or foreigner, who uses this paper, is
as much bound by the public faith to use it according to the terms of
its emission as the Congress is. And Congress have as good a right to
reproach every individual, who now demands more paper for his goods
than silver, with a breach of the public faith, as he has to reproach
the public or their representatives.
I must beg your Excellency's excuse for calling your attention a
little longer to this head of public faith, because I cannot rest
easy, while my country is supposed to be guilty of a breach of their
faith, and in a case where I am clear they have not been so,
especially by your Excellency, whose good opinion they and I value so
much. This public faith is in the nature of a mutual covenant, and he
who would claim a benefit under it, ought to be careful in first
fulfilling his part of it. When Congress issued their bills, declaring
them, in effect, to be equal to silver, they unquestionably intended
that they should be so considered, and that they should be received
accordingly. The people, or individuals covenanted, in effect, to
receive them at their nominal value; and Congress, in such case,
agreed on their part to redeem them at the same rate. This seems to be
a fair and plain construction of this covenant, or public faith; and
none other I think can be made, that will not degenerate into an
unconscionable contract, and so destroy itself.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account