The Diplomatic Correspondence of the American Revolution, Vol. 10
History
The Diplomatic Correspondence of the American Revolution, Vol. 10
United States -- Foreign relations -- 1775-1783; United States -- History -- Revolution, 1775-1783 -- Sources
That it appears from the said letter and the papers enclosed, that
propositions have been made, on the part of the States-General, to the
Ministers of the United States of America at Paris, in order to
render an express stipulation in favor of the freedom of navigation
less necessary in the treaty of peace between Great Britain and the
United Provinces of the Netherlands, either to accede to the treaty of
the armed neutrality already concluded between some powers of Europe,
or to enter into similar engagements with France, Spain, and the
United Provinces of the Netherlands, or, in case France and Spain
should refuse to enter into a Convention founded on the principles of
the armed neutrality, or wish to delay it till after the general
peace, to form a separate convention for similar purposes, between the
United Provinces of the Netherlands and the United States of America.
That the answers to these propositions do not appear from the papers
transmitted, though there is room to infer from M. Dumas's letter of
the fourth and eighteenth of February, that the two first of these
propositions were encouraged by our Ministers, and that the
States-General proposed to act in consequence thereof, and had made
the last proposition, in order to be prepared in case either, or both,
of the two first should fail.
It appears from the report of the Secretary for Foreign Affairs, that
no powers are at present vested in any person in Europe, to agree to
any treaty, similar to that entered into by Russia, Sweden, Denmark,
and the United Provinces of the Netherlands, after the peace shall be
concluded. The resolution of the 5th of October, 1780, empowers the
Ministers of these States, if invited thereto, to accede to such
regulations conformable to the spirit of the declaration of Russia, as
may be agreed upon by the Congress expected to assemble, in pursuance
of the invitation of her Imperial Majesty. Our Ministers received no
invitation, and special powers were afterwards given to Mr Dana,
which, in their nature, superseded that resolution. Mr Dana was by his
commission and instructions empowered to sign the treaty or
convention, for the protection of commerce in behalf of the United
States, either with her Imperial Majesty, in conjunction with the
other neutral powers, or if that shall be inadmissible, separately
with her Imperial Majesty, or any of those, that is, those neutral
powers. The treaty being only made to continue during the war, his
powers terminated with the war, or, at most, extended only to sign it
with the neutral powers, and not to form a new separate treaty.
Whereupon Congress came to the following resolution.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account