The Diplomatic Correspondence of the American Revolution, Vol. 10
History
The Diplomatic Correspondence of the American Revolution, Vol. 10
United States -- Foreign relations -- 1775-1783; United States -- History -- Revolution, 1775-1783 -- Sources
We most sincerely and cordially congratulate Congress and our country
in general on this happy event; and we hope, that the same kind
providence, which has led us through a rigorous war to an honorable
peace, will enable us to make a wise and moderate use of that
inestimable blessing.
We have communicated a duplicate original of the treaty to the care of
Mr Thaxter, who will go immediately to L'Orient, whence he will sail
in the French packet to New York. That gentleman left America with Mr
Adams as his private Secretary, and his conduct having been perfectly
satisfactory to that Minister, we join in recommending him to the
attention of Congress. We have ordered Mr Grand to pay him one hundred
and thirty louis d'ors, on account of the reasonable expenses to be
incurred by his mission to Congress, and his journey from thence to
his family at Hingham, in the Massachusetts Bay. For the disposition
of the money he is to account. The definitive treaty being in the
terms of the Provisional Articles, and not comprehending any of the
objects of our subsequent negotiations, it is proper that we give a
summary account of them.
When Mr Hartley arrived here, he brought with him only a set of
instructions, signed by the King. We objected to proceeding with him
until he should have a commission in form. This occasioned some delay.
A proper commission was, however, transmitted to him, a copy of which
was shortly after sent to Mr Livingston.
We having been instructed to obtain, if possible, an Article for a
direct trade to the West Indies, made to Mr Hartley the proposition
No. 1.[18]
He approved of it greatly, and recommended it to his Court, but they
declined assenting to it.
Mr Hartley then made us the proposition No. 2;[19] but being asked,
whether he was authorised to sign it, in case we agreed to it, he
answered in the negative. We, therefore, thought it improper to
proceed to the consideration of it, until after he should have
obtained the consent of his Court to it. We also desired to be
informed, whether his Court would, or would not, comprehend Ireland in
their stipulations with us.
The British Cabinet would not adopt Mr Hartley's propositions, but
their letters to him were calculated to inspire us with expectations,
that as nothing but particular local circumstances, which would
probably not be of long duration, restrained them from preferring the
most liberal system of commerce with us, the Ministry would take the
earliest opportunity of gratifying their own wishes, as well as ours,
on that subject.
Mr Hartley then made us the propositions No. 3.[20] At this time, we
were informed, that letters for us had arrived in France from
Philadelphia; we expected to receive instructions in them, and told Mr
Hartley, that this expectation induced us to postpone giving him an
answer for a few days.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account