The Diplomatic Correspondence of the American Revolution, Vol. 10
History
The Diplomatic Correspondence of the American Revolution, Vol. 10
United States -- Foreign relations -- 1775-1783; United States -- History -- Revolution, 1775-1783 -- Sources
With regard to its destination, the undersigned had thought that he
could flatter himself, that his character and conduct would prevent
the doubts which a member of Congress has communicated in writing to
the King's navy agent. Nevertheless, as so weighty a suspicion,
declared in so serious a manner, and impeaching the probity and
fidelity of the officers of the King, acting immediately under the
direction of the said Minister, cannot have been suggested to Congress
without important reasons, the undersigned entreats and requests them
to be pleased to cause an account to be rendered of the reasons of his
suspicions, and of the facts upon which they may have been grounded.
The undersigned requests further, that the result of this verification
may be communicated to him, in order that he may be in a situation to
take the further part, that the dignity of the King, his respect for
Congress, his regard for the public interest of America, and the
delicacy which ought to characterise the conduct of every public man,
may require.
The undersigned makes the same request, and for the same reasons, with
regard to the accusation made to Congress, that the vessels, which
have been fitted out in the name of the King, have been loaded with
quantities of flour on individual account. He declares that his first
rule has always been to cause the whole of the vessels to be freighted
on his Majesty's account; but if any frauds have been committed in
this matter, it is of equal importance to the public good, and to the
dignity of the King, that its authors should be known, in order to
prevent further frauds. The delegates to Congress, by a verbal
declaration made to the King's navy agent, have confined this
imputation to one vessel alone, but it is not less important that the
fact should be verified.
Besides, although the Minister Plenipotentiary of France insists on
this point, in order to make these odious imputations fall on those
who may deserve them, he could have contented himself with declaring,
that not having the right of police and inspection over the
proprietors, owners, and Captains of the American vessels, which have
been employed in these transportations, and who ought to be better
acquainted than strangers with the laws of the country, it is only the
officers of the State, appointed to receive the declarations of the
ships which sail from the ports, who can, in examining the cargoes,
determine the frauds which may have been committed; and that without
directly and positively blaming the officers of the King, they cannot
be made responsible for frauds, which it is not in their power to
prevent. Very far from desiring any connivance on the part of the
officers or of the governments of the different States of America, the
undersigned earnestly desires, that they would be pleased to execute
with vigor the powers which belong to them, and the laws which may
have reference to these subjects.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account