The discovery and decipherment of the trilingual cuneiform inscriptionsBooth, Arthur John
History
The discovery and decipherment of the trilingual cuneiform inscriptions
Booth, Arthur John
Achaemenian inscriptions; Cuneiform inscriptions
attribute chiefly to the incompleteness of the alphabet.[567]
When the letters of Rawlinson’s original alphabet were distributed into
the various classes of gutturals, palatals, and so on, and among the
subdivisions of surds, aspirates, and sonants, they were found sufficient
to suggest the existence of some such law in the cases that have been
named. With Holtzmann’s correction of 19 (𐎮) from _t_ to _d_, he had the
three _d’s_ required to complete his sonants of the dental class. His
own list gave him the three _m’s_ required for the sonants of the nasal
class; and he already knew that one was used only before _i_, and the
other only before _u_. He knew also that the aspirates of three of the
classes were to be found indifferently before any vowel. In the case of
the surds, he had found that five of them (_k_ 𐎣, _ch_ 𐎨, _t_ 𐎫, _n_ 𐎴,
_r_ 𐎼) are always to be found before either an _a_ or an _i_. He knew
also that his second sign for _n_ 𐎵 (43) and his second sign for _r_ 𐎽
were only to be found before _u_; and he observed that the signs he still
read (𐎤) _kh_ and (𐎬) _th_ were also only found before _u_. It required,
therefore, no great effort to deprive them of their _h_, and to range
them with the others as the second signs in the surd grades for _k_ and
_t_.
Once the existence of this law was inferred, Rawlinson was led to make
other modifications in his original alphabet, in order to bring it
into strict conformity, and in every instance the alteration has been
confirmed. The following Table shows the distribution of the letters into
the various classes and grades, and the modifications they underwent.
When they fail to comply with the supposed law, the deficiencies are left
blank: when they violate it, the offence is marked by ‘!’.
RAWLINSON’S ALPHABET, AFTER AUGUST 25, 1846[568]
_Gutturals._ Followed by _a_ (𐎠) by _i_ (𐎡) by _u_ (𐎢)
_k_ surd 𐎣 𐎣 𐎤
_kh_ aspirate 𐎧 — 𐎧
_g_ sonant 𐎥 ? 𐎦
_Palatals_
_ch_ surd 𐎨 𐎨 —
_j_ sonant 𐎩 𐎪 —
_Dentals_
_t_ surd 𐎫 𐎫 𐎬
_th_ aspirate 𐎰 𐎰 𐎰
_d_ sonant 𐎭 𐎮 𐎯
_Labials_
_p_ surd 𐎱 𐎱 𐎱!
_f_ aspirate 𐎳? ? ?
_b_ sonant 𐎲 𐎲! 𐎲!
_Nasals_
_n_ surd 𐎴 𐎴 𐎵
_ñ_ aspirate 𐎾 ? ?
_m_ sonant 𐎶 𐎷 𐎸
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account