The Discovery of America Vol. 1 (of 2): with some account of Ancient America and the Spanish ConquestFiske, John
History
The Discovery of America Vol. 1 (of 2): with some account of Ancient America and the Spanish Conquest
Fiske, John
America -- Discovery and exploration; Latin America -- History
estimates of two very important Spanish authorities, Las Casas and
Torquemada, when correctly understood.[97] We may therefore suppose that
the population of Tlascala was about 30,000. Now the population of the
city of Granada, at the time of its conquest by Ferdinand and Isabella,
is said by the greatest of Spanish historians[98] to have been about
200,000. It would thus appear that Cortes sometimes let his feelings run
away with him; and, all things considered, small blame to him if he did!
In studying the story of the Spanish conquest of America, liberal
allowance must often be made for inaccuracies of statement that were
usually pardonable and sometimes inevitable.
[Footnote 96: "La qual ciudad ... es muy mayor que Granada, y
muy mas fuerte, y de tan buenos edificios, y de mucha mas
gente, que Granada tenia al tiempo que se gano." Cortes,
_Relacion segunda al Emperador_, ap. Lorenzana, p. 58, cited in
Prescott's _Conquest of Mexico_, vol. i. p. 401 (7th ed.,
London, 1855).]
[Footnote 97: See Bandelier's _Archaeological Tour in Mexico_,
Boston, 1885, pp. 160-164. Torquemada's words, cited by
Bandelier, are "Quando entraron los Espanoles, dicen que tenia
mas de quarenta mil vecinos esta ciudad." _Monarquia Indiana_,
lib. iii. cap. xix. p. 281. A prolific source of error is the
ambiguity in the word _vecinos_, which may mean either
"inhabitants" or "householders." Where Torquemada meant 40,000
inhabitants, uncritical writers fond of the marvellous have
understood him to mean 40,000 houses, and multiplying this
figure by 5, the average number of persons _in a modern
family_, have obtained the figure 200,000. But 40,000 houses
peopled after the old Mexican fashion, with at least 200
persons in a house (to put it as low as possible), would make a
city of 8,000,000 inhabitants! Las Casas, in his _Destruycion
de las Indias_, vii., puts the population of Cholula at about
30,000. I observe that Llorente (in his _Oeuvres de Las Casas_,
tom. i. p. 38) translates the statement correctly. I shall
recur to this point below, vol. ii. p. 264.]
[Footnote 98: Mariana, _Historia de Espana_, Valencia, 1795,
tom. viii. p. 317.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account