The Discovery of America Vol. 1 (of 2): with some account of Ancient America and the Spanish ConquestFiske, John
History
The Discovery of America Vol. 1 (of 2): with some account of Ancient America and the Spanish Conquest
Fiske, John
America -- Discovery and exploration; Latin America -- History
finally over the whole civil administration. One step more was needed to
develop the _basileus_ into a despot, like the king of Persia, and that
was to let him get into his hands the law-making power, involving
complete control over taxation. When the Greeks and Romans became
dissatisfied with the increasing powers of their kings, they destroyed
the office. The Romans did not materially diminish its functions, but
put them into commission, by entrusting them to two consuls of equal
authority elected annually. The Greeks, on the other hand, divided the
royal functions among different officers, as e. g. at Athens among the
nine archons.[121]
[Footnote 118: This title seems precisely equivalent to [Greek:
anax andron], commonly applied to Agamemnon, and sometimes to
other chieftains, in the Iliad.]
[Footnote 119: Ramsay's _Roman Antiquities_, p. 64; Hermann's
_Political Antiquities of Greece_, p. 105; Morgan, _Anc. Soc._,
p. 248.]
[Footnote 120: Such would naturally result from the
desirableness of securing unity of command. If Demosthenes had
been in sole command of the Athenian armament in the harbour of
Syracuse, and had been a _basileus_, with priestly authority,
who can doubt that some such theory of the eclipse as that
suggested by Philochorus would have been adopted, and thus one
of the world's great tragedies averted? See Grote, _Hist.
Greece_, vol. vii. chap. lx. M. Fustel de Coulanges, in his
admirable book _La Cite antique_, pp. 205-210, makes the
priestly function of the king primitive, and the military
function secondary; which is entirely inconsistent with what we
know of barbarous races.]
[Footnote 121: It is worthy of note that the archon who
retained the priestly function was called _basileus_, showing
perhaps that at that time this had come to be most prominent
among the royal functions, or more likely that it was the one
with which reformers had some religious scruples about
interfering. The Romans, too, retained part of the king's
priestly function in an officer called _rex sacrorum_, whose
duty was at times to offer a sacrifice in the forum, and then
run away as fast as legs could carry him,--[Greek: hen thysas
ho basileus, kata tachos apeisi pheugon ex agoras] (!)
Plutarch, _Quaest. Rom._ 63.]
[Sidenote: Mediaeval kingship.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account