The displaying of supposed witchcraft : $b Wherein is affirmed that there are many sorts of deceivers and impostors, and divers persons under a passive delusion of melancholy and fancy. But that there is a corporeal league made betwixt the devil and the witch, or that he sucks on the witches body, has carnal copulation, or that witches are turned into cats, dogs, raise tempests, or the like, is utterly denied and disproved. Wherein also is handled, the existence of angels and spirits, the truth Webster, John
Religion
The displaying of supposed witchcraft : $b Wherein is affirmed that there are many sorts of deceivers and impostors, and divers persons under a passive delusion of melancholy and fancy. But that there is a corporeal league made betwixt the devil and the witch, or that he sucks on the witches body, has carnal copulation, or that witches are turned into cats, dogs, raise tempests, or the like, is utterly denied and disproved. Wherein also is handled, the existence of angels and spirits, the truth
Webster, John
Witchcraft; Witchcraft -- Early works to 1800
without penetration of dimensions, because by his Almighty Power he
might imperceptibly both open and shut the doors, and so enter, and
suddenly stand in the midst of them, and no humane sense be able to
discern it. But however it was, the Disciples did not then believe that
it was Christ with his individual body in which he suffered, but either
(as some of the Fathers believed) that it was his very Spirit that he
yielded up upon the Cross, that appeared in his figure or shape, that
was so pure, fine, and penetrable, that it could pass through any
Medium, though never so dense or solid: or some other Spirit that
assumed his form and shape, which is far more probable and sound. But
howsoever it was, they did believe that it was some Spirit in his
likeness, and not he himself, in that very numerical body in which he
suffered, as may be apparently gathered from the words of _Thomas_
called _Didymus_, who strongly affirmed, saying: _Except I shall see in
his hands the print of the nails, and put my fingers into the print of
the nails, and thrust my hand into his side, I will not believe_.
[Sidenote: _Rolloc. ubi supr._]
[Sidenote: _Vid. Caten. Aur. Tho. Aquin. in locum._]
4. To the grounds of all these doubts our Saviour gives a demonstrative
and infallible solution, which we shall explain in these particulars. 1.
He doth not at all deny the existence or beings of Spirits; neither that
Spirits do not, or cannot make visible apparitions: but doth grant both.
2. But he restrains these apparitions to those inseparable properties
that belong to Bodies and Spirits, that is, a body (that is to say an
humane body) hath flesh and bones, but a Spirit hath neither, as Christs
or humane bodies have; and therefore saith a learned Person upon the
place: _Docet se non esse Spiritum hoc modo: Spiritus, inquit, non habet
carnem & ossa. Ego verò, ut conspicitis, habeo carnem & ossa: Ergo ego
non sum Spiritus. Vide igitur ex sensu & sensibilibus: sensu nimirum
visus; sensu tactus: ex visibilibus & tractabilibus se corpus esse non
autem Spiritum edocet. Per sensum enim fides & gignitur & confirmatur._
So that whether Spirits be taken to be corporeal (and so appear in their
own bodies) or to be incorporeal (and so to appear in assumed bodies)
yet are they both to sight, and especially to feeling, not as humane
bodies are that have flesh and bones. So that however they do, may or
can appear (for it must be considered in that latitude, else our
Saviours argument would not be irrefragable and convincing) they to the
resistibility of touching cannot be as flesh and bones are, for they to
the sense of touching do resist, and are solid, but so the bodies of
Spirits in what appearance soever have not, nor can have, otherwise our
Saviours argument falls to the ground, and proves nothing. 3. He
confirmeth this by the Disciples own proof of feeling and touching the
prints or scars of the nails in his hands, and the print of the wound in
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account