The displaying of supposed witchcraft : $b Wherein is affirmed that there are many sorts of deceivers and impostors, and divers persons under a passive delusion of melancholy and fancy. But that there is a corporeal league made betwixt the devil and the witch, or that he sucks on the witches body, has carnal copulation, or that witches are turned into cats, dogs, raise tempests, or the like, is utterly denied and disproved. Wherein also is handled, the existence of angels and spirits, the truth Webster, John
Religion
The displaying of supposed witchcraft : $b Wherein is affirmed that there are many sorts of deceivers and impostors, and divers persons under a passive delusion of melancholy and fancy. But that there is a corporeal league made betwixt the devil and the witch, or that he sucks on the witches body, has carnal copulation, or that witches are turned into cats, dogs, raise tempests, or the like, is utterly denied and disproved. Wherein also is handled, the existence of angels and spirits, the truth
Webster, John
Witchcraft; Witchcraft -- Early works to 1800
3. The most or all the learned Expositors that have Commented upon this
place of _Exodus_ (as may be seen in Dr. _Willets Hexapla_ and divers
other learned Authors) though they attribute these things done by the
Magicians to the power and assistance of Satan, yet in the manner they
do acknowledge them not to be done really and in truth, but only in shew
and appearance. But what they mean by shew and appearance is not so
easie to find out and determine; for if by it they mean, that they did
it as Juglers and those that use the Art of Leger-de-main do, that is,
by shewing one thing, and then by nimble sleight and agility convey it
away, and suddainly and unperceiveably substitute another thing in its
place, which they perform by leading the Eyes and attentions of the
spectators another way with staring and using of strange and
insignificant words, then we should be soon accorded, for so they might
probably and easily have been performed as we shall prove anon, but this
is not the thing they mean or intend. But some do mean that the Devil
did only deceive the Phantasie and imagination of the beholders, in
causing them to imagine and believe that the rods were changed into
Serpents, when they were not changed at all, but only their imaginations
deceived in thinking them to be Serpents when they were but only rods,
as melancholy persons, Men in Feavers, Phrensies and Maniacal distempers
do often think and affirm that they see strange things when they see no
such things externally, but the Phantasie is only deceived with the
species and images of those things within. This might be granted if
_Pharaoh_ and all the Spectators could be proved to be Men under those
forenamed distempers and the like, though yet that might (and doth
often) come to pass from meer natural causes, where the Devil hath
nothing to do at all. But the beholders of these actions of the
Magicians are neither proved, nor can rationally be supposed to be Men
under any such distempers; but must be understood to be Men of several
constitutions, tempers, and of sound health, and therefore not any way
capable of any such illusions, neither could the Devil in a moment have
so vitiated their imaginations, which we affirm he can no ways do,
except the humours, fumes and spirits in the Body be first altered by
natural causes, which cannot be done instantaneously, and if it could,
then it would follow that no Man could certainly tell, when he were
deceived in his imagination, when not: neither could it be, (as some
imagine,) by casting a mist before their Eyes; for though Christ did
hold the two Disciples Eyes going from _Emaus_, that they did not know
him, it were blasphemous to think that Satan could do so also. And a
mist casting before their Eyes might make them to see more dimly and
confusedly, and cause things to appear greater than they were, but not
to make one thing seem a quite contrary. But it never was yet proved
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account