The displaying of supposed witchcraft : $b Wherein is affirmed that there are many sorts of deceivers and impostors, and divers persons under a passive delusion of melancholy and fancy. But that there is a corporeal league made betwixt the devil and the witch, or that he sucks on the witches body, has carnal copulation, or that witches are turned into cats, dogs, raise tempests, or the like, is utterly denied and disproved. Wherein also is handled, the existence of angels and spirits, the truth Webster, John
Religion
The displaying of supposed witchcraft : $b Wherein is affirmed that there are many sorts of deceivers and impostors, and divers persons under a passive delusion of melancholy and fancy. But that there is a corporeal league made betwixt the devil and the witch, or that he sucks on the witches body, has carnal copulation, or that witches are turned into cats, dogs, raise tempests, or the like, is utterly denied and disproved. Wherein also is handled, the existence of angels and spirits, the truth
Webster, John
Witchcraft; Witchcraft -- Early works to 1800
would God give way (or _Samuel_ be desirous to come) to send a blessed
Soul from its rest for such a frivolous matter, and in no wise to
connive at the wickedness of both _Saul_ and the Witch, and never move
either of them to the amendment of their lives. 10. Where doth Mr.
_Glanvil_ find it mentioned in any part of Scripture? or where is it
recorded in the writings of any reformed or Orthodoxal Divines? or where
in any of their works is it declared, that ever any blessed Soul after
death, was either sent, or did come upon a Divine errand to any here
below? Is it not monstrous confidence (not to say impudence) to utter
such groundless assertions, without any proof, reason, or authority at
all? Let all learned and judicious persons consider and judge.
3. That the Devil assumed the shape of _Samuel_, and acted the whole
business, is the opinion of all, or the most of the learned Divines of
the reformed Churches, of whom we shall crave pardon, if we dissent from
them, it being no fundamental of Religion, nor any Article of the Faith.
And this we profess is not done out of the spirit of contradiction, nor
for singularity, but only because (as we conceive) the Tenent hath no
sufficient grounds neither from Scripture nor sound reason, to support
it, and therefore we shall labour its confutation, by these ensuing
arguments.
1. Because this opinion, that the Devil should perform this apparition,
doth beg two suppositions, never yet sufficiently proved, and that have
in them no certain truth. For first they take for an Hypothesis, that
Devils are meerly and simply incorporeal Spirits, which we shall prove
hereafter to be false. Secondly they take for another Hypothesis, that
Spirits and Devils can assume what bodies they please, and appear in any
figure or shape, which is a meer figment invented by the doating
Schoolmen, as we shall sufficiently make good hereafter.
2. We are not of their opinion, that think, that the Devils do move, and
rove up and down in this elementary world at their pleasure, to act what
they list, and appear when, how and in what shapes they please, for then
the World would be full of nothing almost but apparitions, and every
corner replenished with their ludicrous tricks, as formerly in the times
of blind Popery and ignorance, there was no discourse almost, but of
Fairies, Hobgoblins, apparitions, Spirits, Devils and Souls, ranting in
every house, and playing feats in every Town and Village, when it was
nothing but the superstitious credulity, and ignorant fancies of the
people, joined with the Impostures of the Priests and Monks. And if this
were true, then how should Men know a true natural substance or body,
from these fictitious apparitions? Nay how could a Man have known his
Father or Mother, his Brethren or Sisters, his Kinsmen or Neighbours?
might they not as well have believed them to be Phantasms, and assumed
bodies, as real and true creatures?
[Sidenote: 1 Kings 22.]
[Sidenote: Isa. 37.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account