The displaying of supposed witchcraft : $b Wherein is affirmed that there are many sorts of deceivers and impostors, and divers persons under a passive delusion of melancholy and fancy. But that there is a corporeal league made betwixt the devil and the witch, or that he sucks on the witches body, has carnal copulation, or that witches are turned into cats, dogs, raise tempests, or the like, is utterly denied and disproved. Wherein also is handled, the existence of angels and spirits, the truth Webster, John
Religion
The displaying of supposed witchcraft : $b Wherein is affirmed that there are many sorts of deceivers and impostors, and divers persons under a passive delusion of melancholy and fancy. But that there is a corporeal league made betwixt the devil and the witch, or that he sucks on the witches body, has carnal copulation, or that witches are turned into cats, dogs, raise tempests, or the like, is utterly denied and disproved. Wherein also is handled, the existence of angels and spirits, the truth
Webster, John
Witchcraft; Witchcraft -- Early works to 1800
1. And first to begin at the lowest step, Body is a thing that affecteth
the senses most plainly and feelingly; for though many bodies are so
pure, as the air, æther, steams of the Loadstone, and many other steams
of bodies, that they escape the sight of our eyes, yet are they either
manifest to our feeling, or otherwise made manifest by some sensible
effect, operation, or the like; yet for all this, the intrinsick nature
of body as such is utterly unknown unto us, for when we speak of the
extension of body, as its Characteristical property, we do but conceive
of its superficial dimensions, its internal nature _quatenus Corpus_,
being utterly unknown unto us; it being a certain truth, that
_Quidditates rerum, non sunt cognoscibiles_; and as D^r _Moore_
granteth, the naked essence or substance of a thing is utterly
unconceiveable to any of our faculties. From whence we argue, _à minori
ad majus_, that if the substance of a body, whose affections and
modifications do fully incur into, and work upon our senses, be utterly
unconceiveable to any of our senses, much more of necessity must the
substance of a Created spirit, conceived as immaterial and incorporeal,
be utterly unconceiveable to any of our faculties, because it hath no
effects, operations, or modifications that can or do operate upon our
senses.
[Sidenote: _Argum. 2._]
2. And as we know not the intrinsick nature of body, so also we are
ignorant of the highest degree of the purity and spiritualness of
bodies, nor do we know where they end, and therefore cannot tell where
to fix the beginning of a meer spiritual and immaterial being. For there
are of Created bodies in the Universe, so great a diversity, and of so
many sorts and degrees of purity and fineness, one exceeding another,
that we cannot assign which of them cometh nearest to incorporeity, or
the nature of spirit. And many of these being compared with other more
gross and palpable bodies, may be and are called and accounted spirits,
though notwithstanding they be all Corporeal, and but under a gradual
difference. So the vital part in the bodies of men are by Physicians
called Spirits in relation to the bones, ligaments, musculous flesh and
the like; nay even in respect of the blood, lymphatick humor, lacteal
juyce, or the _succus nutritius nervosus_, and yet still are contained
within the limits of body, and are as really Corporeal as any of the
rest, and so are the air and æther. And those visible species of other
bodies that are carried in the air and represented unto our Eyes, by
which we distinguish the shape, colour, site and similitude of one body
from another, though by the Schools passed over with that sleight title
of qualities, as though they were either simply nothing, or incorporeal
things, are notwithstanding really Corporeal, else they could not incur
into, nor affect the visive sensories: And these do in the air intersect
and pass through one another (as may be optically demonstrated) without
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account