The displaying of supposed witchcraft : $b Wherein is affirmed that there are many sorts of deceivers and impostors, and divers persons under a passive delusion of melancholy and fancy. But that there is a corporeal league made betwixt the devil and the witch, or that he sucks on the witches body, has carnal copulation, or that witches are turned into cats, dogs, raise tempests, or the like, is utterly denied and disproved. Wherein also is handled, the existence of angels and spirits, the truth Webster, John
Religion
The displaying of supposed witchcraft : $b Wherein is affirmed that there are many sorts of deceivers and impostors, and divers persons under a passive delusion of melancholy and fancy. But that there is a corporeal league made betwixt the devil and the witch, or that he sucks on the witches body, has carnal copulation, or that witches are turned into cats, dogs, raise tempests, or the like, is utterly denied and disproved. Wherein also is handled, the existence of angels and spirits, the truth
Webster, John
Witchcraft; Witchcraft -- Early works to 1800
Neither is this distinction good, because as the same Author tells
us: _Non etiam in re differunt spatium, sive locus internus, substantia
corporea in eo contenta, sed tantum in modo, quo à nobis concipi
soleat_. 4. D^r _Moore_ granteth that spirits are substances and have
extension, and we affirm that nothing can be so but what is Corporeal,
and consequently must be in place circumscriptively, and therefore the
fancy of a definitive place, is meerly a fictitious foppery, without
ground or reason.
[Sidenote: _Object. 1._]
[Sidenote: 1 Timoth. 6. 16.]
[Sidenote: Hebr. 1. 3.]
[Sidenote: 1 Tim. 6. 13.]
[Sidenote: Job 34. 14, 15.]
[Sidenote: _De Lithias._ _l._ _c._ 8. _p._ 70.]
And now let us examine the objections that are usually brought against
this opinion, the strongest of which is to this purpose; that if Angels
be Corporeal, then of necessity they must be mortal, alterable and
destructible; to which I answer. 1. Because no Creaturely nature is or
can be immortal, _per se & ab intrinsecâ & propriâ naturâ_, for God only
is so as saith the Text, ὁ μόνος ἔχων ἀθανασίαν, _Who only hath
immortality_; Therefore the Angels whether corporeal or incorporeal, are
not immortal, neither by themselves or their intrinsick nature, either
(as the Schools speak) _à parte ante, vel à parte post_, because God
only is so, exclusively considered in regard of any Creature, and so the
objection is of no force. 2. The Corporeity of Angels doth not at all
hinder their immortality _à parte post_, for as God is only immortal in
respect of Essence, Eternity, Infinity and Independency, so Angels nor
any Creatures, are immortal in that point or respect, but only in regard
of their dependency upon God, who by his conservative power doth keep
them by Christ, that for the time or duration to come, they shall not
die, perish, or be annihilated; and this he can and doth as well perform
if they be corporeal as spiritual, even as he doth preserve and conserve
the bodies of the Saints in their Graves until the general Resurrection,
and in the World to come doth keep them in immortality; though they be
changed and made spiritual bodies, yet they remain bodies still. For it
is he _that sustaineth all things by the power of his word_; And it is
he _that doth vivifie or quicken all things: and if he gather unto
himself his spirit and his breath, all flesh shall perish together, and
man shall turn again unto dust_. So that the objection is of no
validity, because no Creature is kept in perpetual duration, _à parte
post, ab intrinsecâ naturâ, sed ex causis conservantibus_, which is the
goodwill, benignity, and blessed influence of _Jehovah_, and not from
any internal creaturely power. 3. Every spiritual and incorporeal
substance that is created, is as annihilable by the prime power that
created it, as is a Corporeal created substance. And on the contrary, a
Corporeal or material substance is no more capable of annihilation by
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account