The displaying of supposed witchcraft : $b Wherein is affirmed that there are many sorts of deceivers and impostors, and divers persons under a passive delusion of melancholy and fancy. But that there is a corporeal league made betwixt the devil and the witch, or that he sucks on the witches body, has carnal copulation, or that witches are turned into cats, dogs, raise tempests, or the like, is utterly denied and disproved. Wherein also is handled, the existence of angels and spirits, the truth Webster, John
Religion
The displaying of supposed witchcraft : $b Wherein is affirmed that there are many sorts of deceivers and impostors, and divers persons under a passive delusion of melancholy and fancy. But that there is a corporeal league made betwixt the devil and the witch, or that he sucks on the witches body, has carnal copulation, or that witches are turned into cats, dogs, raise tempests, or the like, is utterly denied and disproved. Wherein also is handled, the existence of angels and spirits, the truth
Webster, John
Witchcraft; Witchcraft -- Early works to 1800
Having in the preceding Chapter proved that the Scriptures and sound
Reason, are the proper Mediums to decide these difficulties by, and also
laid down the necessary qualifications requisite in an Author or Witness
that would evidence these things as matters of fact: We shall here once
again repeat the four Particulars, which we are about to confute, which
are these. 1. That the Devil doth not make a visible or corporeal League
and Covenant with the supposed Witches. 2. That he doth not suck upon
their bodies. 3. That he hath not carnal Copulation with them. 4. That
they are not really changed into Cats, Dogs, Wolves, or the like. And
these four Particulars we affirm were never matters of fact, nor ever
had a being, except only in the fancy as meer Chimera’s, nor that they
ever were or can be proved to have been brought to pass or acted; and
_de non apparentibus, & non existentibus eadem est ratio_, saith the
great Maxime of our Law. But in the first place let us hear what the
Patrons of this wretched and execrable opinion have to say to prove that
they are matters of fact, or were ever acted or performed. And first we
have Mr. _Glanvil_ arguing at this rate: “All Histories are full of the
exploits of those instruments of darkness; and the testimony of all
ages, not only of the rude and barbarous, but of the most civilized and
polisht World, brings tidings of their strange performances. We have the
attestation of thousands of eye and ear-witnesses, and those not of the
easily deceivable vulgar only, but of grave and wise discerners; and
that when no interest could oblige them to agree together in a common
lye: I say we have the light of all these circumstances to confirm us in
the belief of things done by persons of despicable power and knowledge,
beyond the reach of Art and ordinary Nature. Standing publick Records
have been kept of these well attested Relations, and Epocha’s made of
those unwonted events. Laws in many Nations have been enacted against
those vile practices; those among the Jews and our own are notorious;
such Cases have been often determined near us, by wise and reverend
Judges, upon clear convictive Evidence, and thousands in our own Nation
have suffered death for their vile compacts with Apostate Spirits.” And
a little after he saith: “And I think those that can believe all
Histories are Romances; that all the wiser World have agreed together to
juggle Mankind into a common belief of ungrounded Fables; that the sound
senses of multitudes together may deceive them, and Laws are built upon
Chimera’s; that the gravest and wisest Judges have been Murderers, and
the sagest persons Fools or designing Impostors.” Bishop _Hall_ maketh
the like Objection, saying: “Neither can I make question of the
authentick Records of the Examinations and Confessions of Witches and
Sorcerers in several Regions of the World, agreeing in the truth of
their horrible pacts with Satan, of their set Meetings with evil
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account