The displaying of supposed witchcraft : $b Wherein is affirmed that there are many sorts of deceivers and impostors, and divers persons under a passive delusion of melancholy and fancy. But that there is a corporeal league made betwixt the devil and the witch, or that he sucks on the witches body, has carnal copulation, or that witches are turned into cats, dogs, raise tempests, or the like, is utterly denied and disproved. Wherein also is handled, the existence of angels and spirits, the truth Webster, John
Religion
The displaying of supposed witchcraft : $b Wherein is affirmed that there are many sorts of deceivers and impostors, and divers persons under a passive delusion of melancholy and fancy. But that there is a corporeal league made betwixt the devil and the witch, or that he sucks on the witches body, has carnal copulation, or that witches are turned into cats, dogs, raise tempests, or the like, is utterly denied and disproved. Wherein also is handled, the existence of angels and spirits, the truth
Webster, John
Witchcraft; Witchcraft -- Early works to 1800
So that it may truly be said of them, _They delight in
lyes_, and their confessions are nothing but lyes. And if they object
and say, that here we confess a League with the Devil and the Witch,
otherwise the Witches could not be his Children, Vassals, and
Bond-slaves, which elsewhere we deny; we answer, it is a gross mistake,
in not observing the distinction we make betwixt a mental and spiritual
League, such as the Devil and _Judas_ made, and such as all wicked men
make with him, and under this League we acknowledge all Witches to be;
but a visible and corporeal League we positively deny, and so the
objection is of no validity. And thus we suppose we have sufficiently
proved, that there ought no credit at all to be given to the Confessions
of Witches, no more than to Devils, who are all lyars.
Now let us proceed to their third main Objection: That so many wise and
grave Judges and honest Juries could not have been deceived, to put to
death such great numbers of those kind of people, without sufficient
proof of the matters of fact. Against which we oppose these following
Reasons.
[Sidenote: _Reas. 1._]
1. It is but an Argument at the best to drive the other Party into an
absurdity, which is not of any such dangerous consequence, as may be
supposed; for it would but conclude, that many grave and wise Judges and
Juries have been imposed upon, and deceived, which is but _argumentum ad
homines_, and doubtless many might, and have been. And do not we
Christians hold, that the gravest and wisest Judges amongst the _Turks_
and _Persians_ have been, and are deceived, and have done unjustly in
persecuting and putting Christians to death, because they would not
submit to the Religion of _Mahomet_, and yet we account it no absurdity
or injustice to pass that censure upon them? And do not the Idolaters in
all those large Empires and Kingdoms of _Tartary_, _China_, the _Moguls_
Country, and the rest of those Countries in the East of _Asia_ persecute
and put many to death, for not worshipping their Idols, or embracing
their Religion; and do we think it absurd to censure and condemn them of
injustice, though in their own Countries they be accounted grave and
wise Judges? Surely we do not, and there is the parity of reason in both
the Arguments, for all are but men, and so may erre.
[Sidenote: _Reas. 2._]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account