The Disputed V.C.: A Tale of the Indian MutinyGibbon, Frederick P.
History
The Disputed V.C.: A Tale of the Indian Mutiny
Gibbon, Frederick P.
India -- History -- Sepoy Rebellion, 1857-1858 -- Juvenile fiction
A glacis is a huge bank of earth sloping outwards from the walls, and
not only does it shield the lower portions, but, should an enemy
attempt to escalade the walls or carry the city by assault, they would
first have to run up this glacis, and there they would present such a
target that trained gunners could sweep the assailants away by hundreds.
The engineers, who had so skilfully and carefully constructed these
defences, little thought that their handiwork would merely serve to keep
India in a ferment for many months. The batteries were manned by
artillerymen who had learned their profession--and learned it, alas! too
well--under the tuition of English officers. Within the walls were more
than 20,000 trained and disciplined sepoys, men who had proved their
valour on many a well-fought field, not to mention thousands on
thousands of armed fanatics, warriors by birth and by tradition. All
these fought under shelter, which our brave fellows lacked. But ours
were British, "strong with the strength of the race to command, to obey,
to endure", save the one Gurkha battalion and the Guide Corps (now close
at hand), and these were soon admitted as equals by the British
soldiers.
The British army was small--very small--but the lack of powerful
artillery was an even greater source of weakness. An army without
artillery, matched against even an equal force well supplied with
powerful guns, would have as much chance of success as a man armed with
a light cane fighting another possessed of sword and revolver.
Thousands of people in England and in India, who eagerly devoured the
news and anxiously awaited the fall of the capital, impatiently asked,
"Why are they so long? Why don't they take the city?" These worthy folks
could not understand the difficulties; they could not realize that mere
pluck and endurance avail nothing against stone walls and mighty cannon.
As the weeks rolled by and Delhi was still untaken, other persons, still
more ignorant, exclaimed, "Why don't they leave Delhi if they can't
capture it, and go and help Sir Henry Lawrence at Lucknow?" They did
not see that even if that small army appeared to be doing little, it
still kept shut up in the city forty thousand armed rebels who might
otherwise be spreading over the country conquering and slaying. Nor did
they grasp the fact that had the English army left Delhi unconquered the
warlike Punjab, and then all India, would have risen. To have left the
Mogul capital would have been a confession of weakness; it would have
been to say: "We are beaten, we can do nothing here", and when once the
English say that in India, their empire will collapse.
So, though Barnard's handful was attacking Delhi contrary to all the
rules of war, we must remember what Mr. Rudyard Kipling has pointed out,
that had our British generals never acted against those rules the
boundaries of the empire would have stayed at Brighton beach.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account