_Combien de changemens depuis que suis au monde,
Qui n'est qu' un point du tems!_
PASQUIER.
Peter Hopkins was a person who might have suffered death by the laws
of Solon, if that code had been established in this country; for
though he lived in the reigns of George I. and George II. he was
neither Whig nor Tory, Hanoverian nor Jacobite. When he drank the
King's health with any of his neighbours, he never troubled himself
with considering which King was intended, nor to which side of the
water their good wishes were directed. Under George or Charles he
would have been the same quiet subject, never busying himself with a
thought about political matters, and having no other wish concerning
them than that they might remain as they were,—so far he was a
Hanoverian, and no farther. There was something of the same temper in
his religion; he was a sincere Christian, and had he been born to
attendance at the Mass or the Meeting House would have been equally
sincere in his attachment to either of those extremes. For his whole
mind was in his profession. He was learned in its history; fond of its
theories; and skilful in its practice, in which he trusted little to
theory and much to experience.
Both he and his wife were at this time well stricken in years; they
had no children, and no near kindred on either side; and being both
kind-hearted people, the liking which they soon entertained toward
Daniel for his docility, his simplicity of heart, his obliging temper,
his original cast of mind, and his never failing good-humour, ripened
into a settled affection.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account