Mahomet begins some of the chapters of the Koran with certain letters
of unknown signification, and the commentators say that the meaning of
these initials ought not to be enquired. So Gelaleddin says, so sayeth
Taleb. And they say truly. Some begin with A. L. M. Some with K. H. I.
A. S.: some with T. H.;—T. S. M.;—T. S. or I. S. others with K. M.;—H.
M. A. S. K.;—N. M.;—a single _Kaf_, a single _Nun_ or a single _Sad_,
and _sad_ work would it be either for _Kaffer_ or Mussulman to search
for meaning where _none_ is. Gelaleddin piously remarks that there is
only One who knoweth the import of these letters—I reverence the name
which he uses too much to employ it upon this occasion. Mahomet
himself tells us that they are the signs of the Book which teacheth
the true doctrine,—the Book of the Wise,—the Book of Evidence, the
Book of Instruction. When he speaketh thus of the Koran he lieth like
an impostor as he is: but what he has said falsely of that false book
may be applied truly to this. It is the Book of Instruction inasmuch
as every individual reader among the thousands and tens of thousands
who peruse it will find something in it which he did not know before.
It is the Book of Evidence because of its internal truth. It is the
Book of the Wise, because the wiser a man is the more he will delight
therein; yea, the delight which he shall take in it will be the
measure of his intellectual capacity. And that it teacheth the true
doctrine is plain from this circumstance, that I defy the British
Critic, the Antijacobin, the Quarterly and the Eclectic Reviews,—aye,
and the Evangelical, the Methodist, the Baptist and the Orthodox
Churchman's Magazine, with the Christian Observer to boot, to detect
any one heresy in it. Therefore I say again
Aballiboozobanganorribo,
and like Mahomet I say that it is the Sign of the Book; and therefore
it is that I have said it;
_Nondimen nè la lingua degli Hebrei
Nè la Latina, nè la Greca antica,
Nè quella forse ancor degli Aramei._[1]
[Footnote 1: MOLZA.]
Happen it may,—for things not less strange have happened, and what has
been may be again;—for may be and has been are only tenses of the same
verb, and that verb is eternally being declined:——Happen I say it may;
and peradventure if it may it must; and certainly if it must it
will:—but what with indicatives and subjunctives, presents,
præterperfects and paulo-post-futura, the parenthesis is becoming too
long for the sentence, and I must begin it again. A prudent author
should never exact too much from the breath or the attention of his
reader,—to say nothing of the brains.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account