William had heard so much about experiments that it is not surprising
he should have been for making some himself. It was well indeed for
his family that the speculative mind, which lay covered rather than
concealed under the elder Daniel's ruminating manners, and quiet
contented course of life, was not quickened by his acquaintance with
the schoolmaster into an experimental and dangerous activity, instead
of being satisfied with theoretical dreams. For Guy had found a book
in that little collection which might have produced more serious
consequences to the father than the imitation of Gargantua had done to
the son.
This book was the Exposition of Eirenæus Philalethes upon Sir George
Ripley's Hermetico-Poetical works. Daniel had formerly set as little
value upon it as upon Rabelais. He knew indeed what its purport was,
thus much he had gathered from it: but although it professed to
contain “the plainest and most excellent discoveries of the most
hidden secrets of the Ancient Philosophers that were ever yet
published,” it was to him as unintelligible as the mysteries of
Pantagruelism. He could make nothing of the work that was to ascend in
_Bus_ and _Nubi_ from the Moon up to the Sun, though the Expositor had
expounded that this was in _Nubibus_; nor of the Lake which was to be
boiled with the ashes of Hermes's Tree, night and day without ceasing,
till the Heavenly Nature should ascend and the Earthly descend: nor of
the Crow's bill, the White Dove, the Sparkling Cherubim, and the Soul
of the Green Lion. But he took those cautions simply and honestly as
cautions, which were in fact the lures whereby so many infatuated
persons had been drawn on to their own undoing. The author had said
that his work was not written for the information of the illiterate,
and illiterate Daniel knew himself to be. “Our writings,” says the
dark Expositor, “shall prove as a curious edged knife; to some they
shall carve out dainties, and to others it shall serve only to cut
their fingers. Yet we are not to be blamed; for we do seriously
profess to any that shall attempt the work, that he attempts the
highest piece of Philosophy that is in Nature; and though we write in
English, yet our matter will be as hard as Greek to some, who will
think they understand us well, when they misconstrue our meaning most
perversely; for is it imaginable that they who are fools in Nature
should be wise in our Books, which are testimonies unto Nature?” And
again, “make sure of thy true matter, which is no small thing to know;
and though we have named it yet we have done it so cunningly, that
thou mayest sooner stumble at our Books than at any thou ever didst
read in thy life.—Be not deceived either with receipt or discourse;
for we verily do not intend to deceive you; but if you will be
deceived, be deceived!—Our way which is an easy way, and in which no
man may err,—our broad way, our _linear_ way, we have vowed never to
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account