Jan Mass had nearly reached his hundredth year when this was written,
and it is no wonder that Van Helmont, who upon a fantastic analogy had
really prescribed an efficient tonic, should have accounted by the
virtue of his prescription for the health and vigour, which a strong
constitution had retained to that extraordinary age. There is no
reason for doubting the truth of his statement; but if Van Helmont
relied upon his theory, he must have made further experiments; it is
probable therefore that he either distrusted his own hypothesis, or
found upon subsequent trials that the result disappointed him.
Van Helmont's works were collected and edited by his son Francis
Mercurius, who styles himself _Philosophus per Unum in quo Omnia
Eremita peregrinans_, and who dedicated the collection as a holocaust
to the ineffable Hebrew Name. The Vita Authoris which he prefixed to
it relates to his own life, not to his father's, and little can be
learnt from it, except that he is the more mystical and least
intelligible of the two. The most curious circumstances concerning the
father are what he has himself communicated in the treatise entitled
his Confession, into which the writer of his life in Aikin's Biography
seems not to have looked, nor indeed into any of his works, the
articles in that as in our other Biographies, being generally compiled
from compilations, so as to present the most superficial information,
with the least possible trouble to the writer and the least possible
profit to the reader,—skimming for him not the cream of knowledge, but
the scum.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account