Erroneous opinions in religion being promulgated in this country by women as well as men, the teachers of such false doctrines may be divided into Heresiarchs and Sheresiarchs, so that we should speak of the Heresy of the Quakers the Sheresy of Joanna Southcote's people. The troublesome affection of the diaphragm, which every person has experienced, is upon the same principle to be called according to the sex of the patient Hecups or Shecups, which upon the principle of making our language truly British is better than the more classical form of Hiccups and Hæccups. In its objective use the word becomes Hiscups or Hercups, and in like manner Histerics should be altered into Herterics, the complaint never being masculine. So also instead of making such words as agreeable, comfortable, &c. adjectives of one termination, I would propose, Masculine agreabeau, Feminine agreabelle comfortabeau comfortabelle miserabeau miserabelle, &c. &c. These things are suggested as hints to Mr. Pytches, to be by him perpended in his improvement of our Dictionary. I beg leave also to point out for his critical notice the remarkable difference in the meaning of the word misfortune, as applied to man, woman, or child: a peculiarity for which perhaps no parallel is to be found in any other language. But to return from these philological speculations to the Anti-Jacobin by whom we have been led to them, how is it that this critic, great master as he is of the vulgar tongue, should affirm that breeches is the only word by which this part of a man's dress can be expressed. Had he forgotten that there was such a word as galligaskins?—to say nothing of inexpressibles and dont-mention 'ems. Why also did he forget pantaloons?—and thus the Chapter like a rondeau comes round to St. Pantaleon with whom it began, _Sancte Pantaleon, ora pro nobis!_ “Here is another Chapter without a heading,”—the Compositor would have said when he came to this part of the Manuscript, if he had not seen at a glance, that in my great consideration I had said it for him. Yes, Mr. Compositor! Because of the matter whereon it has to treat, we must, if you please, entitle this an ARCH-CHAPTER. A Frenchman once, who was not ashamed of appearing ignorant on such a subject, asked another who with some reputation for classical attainments had not the same rare virtue, what was the difference between Dryads and Hamadryads; and the man of erudition gravely replied that it was much the same as that between Bishops and Archbishops. I have dignified this Arch-Chapter in its designation, because it relates to the King. Dr. Gooch, you are hereby requested to order this book for his Majesty's library, _C'est une rare pièce, et digne sur ma foi, Qu'on en fasse présent au cabinet d'un roi._[1] [Footnote 1: MOLIERE.]