The reader need not be told that his objections were not puritanical,
but physical. The moralist who cautioned his friend to refrain from
dancing, because it was owing to a dance that John the Baptist lost
his head, talked, he said, like a fool. Nor would he have formed a
much more favourable opinion of the Missionary in South Africa, who
told the Hottentots that dancing is a work of darkness, and that a
fiddle is Satan's own instrument. At such an assertion he would have
exclaimed a fiddlestick![4]—Why and how that word has become an
interjection of contempt, I must leave those to explain who can. The
Albigenses and the Vaudois are said to have believed that a dance is
the Devil's procession, in which they who dance break the promise and
vow which their sponsors made for them at their baptism that they
should renounce the Devil and all his works, the pomps and vanities of
this wicked world,—(not to proceed further,)—this being one of his
works, and undeniably one of the aforesaid vanities and pomps. They
break moreover all the ten commandments, according to these fanatics;
for fanatics they must be deemed who said this; and the manner in
which they attempted to prove the assertion by exemplifying it through
the decalogue, shows that the fermentation of their minds was in the
acetous stage.
[Footnote 4: The explanation following is given in Grose's Classical
Dictionary of the Vulgar Tongue. FIDDLESTICK'S END. Nothing: the ends
of the ancient fiddlesticks ending in a point: hence metaphorically
used to express a thing terminating in nothing.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account