“_Souvent_,” says Brântome, “ceux qui portent le nom de leurs ayeuls,
leur _ressemblent volontiers, comme je l'ay veu observer et en
discourir à aucuns philosophes._” He makes this remark after observing
that the Emperor Ferdinand was named after his grandfather Ferdinand
of Arragon, and Charles V. after his great grandfather Charles the
Bold. But such resemblances are as Brântome implies, imitational where
they exist. And Mr. Keightley's observation, that “a man's name and
his occupation have often a most curious coincidence,” rests perhaps
on a similar ground, men being sometimes designated by their names for
the way of life which they are to pursue. Many a boy has been called
Nelson in our own days, and Rodney in our fathers', because he was
intended for the sea service, and many a seventh son has been
christened Luke in the hope that he might live to be a physician. In
what other business than that of a lottery-office would the name
Goodluck so surely have brought business to the house? Captain Death
could never have practised medicine or surgery, unless under an alias;
but there would be no better name with which to meet an enemy in
battle. Dr. Damman was an eminent physician and royal professor of
midwifery at Ghent in the latter part of the last century. He ought to
have been a Calvinistic divine.
The Ancients paid so great a regard to names, that whenever a number
of men were to be examined on suspicion, they began by putting to the
torture the one whose name was esteemed the vilest. And this must not
be supposed to have had its origin in any reasonable probability, such
as might be against a man who being apprehended for a riot, should say
his name was Patrick Murphy, or Dennis O'Connor, or Thady O'Callaghan;
or against a Moses Levi, or a Daniel Abrahams for uttering bad money;
it was for the import of the name itself, and the evidence of a base
and servile origin which it implied.
“_J'ai été tousjours fort etonné_,” says Bayle, “_que les familles qui
portent un nom odieux ou ridicule, ne le quitent pas._” The
Leatherheads and Shufflebottoms, the Higgenses and Huggenses, the
Scroggses and the Scraggses, Sheepshanks and Ramsbottoms, Taylors and
Barbers, and worse than all, Butchers, would have been to Bayle as
abominable as they were to Dr. Dove. I ought, the Doctor would say, to
have a more natural dislike to the names of Kite, Hawk, Falcon and
Eagle; and yet they are to me (the first excepted) less odious than
names like these: and even preferable to Bull, Bear, Pig, Hog, Fox or
Wolf.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account