He was not acquainted with the speculation, or conception (as the
Philotheistic philosopher himself called it) of Giordano Bruno, that
_deformium animalium formæ, formosæ sunt in cœlo_. Nor would he have
assented to some of the other opinions which that pious and high
minded victim of papal intolerance, connected with it. That
_metallorum in se non lucentium formæ, lucent in planetis suis_, he
might have supposed, if he had believed in the relationship between
metals and planets. And if Bruno's remark applied to the Planets only,
as so many other worlds, and did not regard the future state of the
creatures of this our globe, the Doctor might then have agreed to his
assertion that _non enim homo, nec animalia, nec metalla ut hic sunt,
illic existunt_. But the Philotheist of Nola, in the remaining part of
this his twelfth _Conceptus Idearum_ soared above the Doctor's pitch:
_Quod nempe hic discurrit_, he says, _illic actu viget, discursione
superiori. Virtutes enim quæ versus materiam explicantur: versus actum
primum uniuntur, et complicantur. Unde patet quod dicunt Platonici,
ideam quamlibet rerum etiam non viventium, vitam esse et
intelligentiam quandam. Item et in Primâ Mente unam esse rerum omnium
ideam. Illuminando igitur, vivificando, et uniendo est quod te
superioribus agentibus conformans, in conceptionem et retentionem
specierum efferaris._ Here the Philosopher of Doncaster would have
found himself in the dark, but whether because “blinded by excess of
light,” or because the subject is within the confines of uttermost
darkness, is not for me his biographer to determine.
CHAPTER CCXIV.
FURTHER DIFFICULTIES.—QUESTION CONCERNING INFERIOR APPARITIONS.—BLAKE
THE PAINTER, AND THE GHOST OF A FLEA.
_In amplissimâ causâ, quasi magno mari, pluribus ventis sumus vecti._
PLINY.
There was another argument against the immortality of brutes, to which
it may be, he allowed the more weight, because it was of his own
excogitating. Often as he had heard of apparitions in animal forms,
all such tales were of some spirit or hobgoblin which had assumed that
appearance; as, for instance that _simulacrum admodum monstruosum_,
that portentous figure in which Pope Gregory the ninth after his death
was met roaming about the woods by a holy hermit: it was in the form
of a wild beast with the head of an ass, the body of a bear, and the
tail of a cat. Well might the good hermit fortify himself with making
the sign of the cross when he beheld this monster: he approved himself
a courageous man by speaking to the apparition which certainly was not
“in such a questionable shape” as to invite discourse: and we are
beholden to him for having transmitted to posterity the bestial Pope's
confession, that because he had lived an unreasonable and lawless
life, it was the will of God and of St. Peter whose chair he had
defiled by all kinds of abominations, that he should thus wander about
in a form of ferine monstrosity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account