The benevolent reader will willingly do this, he I mean who is
benevolent to himself as well as towards me. The so-called philosopher
or man of liberal opinions, who cannot be so inimical in thought to
me, as they are indeed to themselves, will frown at it; one such
exclaims pshaw, or pish, according as he may affect the _forté_
manner, or the fine, of interjecting his contemptuous displeasure;
another already winces, feeling himself by anticipation touched upon a
sore place. To such readers it were hopeless to say _favete_,
“_Numquid æger laudat medicum secantem?_” But I shall say with the
Roman Philosopher of old, who is well entitled to that then honourable
designation, “_tacete,—et præbete vos curationi: etiam si
exclamaveritis, non aliter audiam, quam si ad tactum vitiorum
vestrorum ingemiscatis._”[2]
[Footnote 2: SENECA.]
My own observation has led me to believe with Mr. Miller, that some
persons are brought by speculating upon a Plurality of Worlds to
reason themselves out of their belief in Christianity: such
Christianity indeed it is as has no root, because the soil on which it
has fallen is shallow, and though the seed which has been sown there
springs up, it soon withers away. Thus the first system of
superstition, and the latest pretext for unbelief have both been
derived from the contemplation of the heavenly bodies. The former was
the far more pardonable error, being one to which men, in the first
ages, among whom the patriarchal religion had not been carefully
preserved, were led by natural piety. The latter is less imputable to
the prevalence of unnatural impiety,—than to that weakness of mind and
want of thought which renders men as easily the dupe of the infidel
propagandist in one age, as of the juggling friar in another. These
objectors proceed upon the gratuitous assumption that other worlds are
inhabited by beings of the same kind as ourselves, and moreover in the
same condition; that is having fallen, and being therefore in need of
a Redeemer. Ask of them upon what grounds they assume this, and they
can make no reply.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account