Sometimes, however, I think that it is the newspapers are not so amusing
as they used to be. The racy old bitterness of party spirit is dying
out, and all the spicy drollery and epigrammatic fun of former days gone
with it. It strikes me, too, Tom, that "Party," in the strong sense,
never can exist again amongst us. Party is essentially the submission of
the many to the few; and so long as the few were pre-eminent in ability
and tactical skill, nothing was more salutary. Wal-pole, Pelham, Pitt,
and Fox stood immeasurably above the men and the intelligence of
their time. Their statecraft was a science of which the mass of
their followers were totally ignorant, and the crew never dreamt of
questioning the pilot as to the course he was about to take. Whereas
now--although by no means deficient in able and competent men to
rule us--the body of the House is filled by others very little their
inferiors. Old Babbington used to say "that between a good physician and
a bad one, there was only the difference between a pound and a guinea."
In the same way, there is not a wider interval now between the Right
Honorable Secretary on the Treasury Bench and the Honorable Member below
him. Education is widely disseminated,--the intercourse of club life is
immense,--opportunities of knowledge abound on every hand,--the Press is
a great popular instructor; and, above all, the temper and tendency of
the age favors labor of every kind. Idleness is not in vogue with any
class of the whole community. What chance, then, of any man, no matter
how great and gifted he be, imposing, his opinions--_as such_--upon
the world of politics! A minister, or his opponent, may get together a
number of supporters for a particular measure, just as you or I could
muster a mob at an election or a fair; but there would be no more
discipline in the one case than in the other. They'd come now, and go
when they liked; and any chance of reducing such "irregulars" to the
habits of an army would be downright impossible!
There is another cause of dulness, too, in the newspapers. All the
accidents--a most amusing column it used to be--are now entirely caused
by railroads; and there is a shocking sameness about them. They were
"shunting" wagons across the line when the express came up, or the
pointsman did n't turn the switch, or the fog obscured the danger
signal. With these three explanations, some hundreds of human beings are
annually smashed, smothered, and scalded, and the survivors not a whit
more provident than before.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account