the landlord it affords a fair and a certain remuneration, subject only
to the vicissitudes of seasons and the rate of prices. It attaches him
to the soil, and to those who till it, by the very strongest of all
interests, and, even on selfish grounds, enforces a degree of regard for
the well-being of those beneath him. The peasant, on the other hand,
is neither a rack-rented tenant nor a hireling, but an independent man,
profiting by every exercise of his own industry, and deriving direct
and positive benefit from every hour of his labor. It is not alone his
character that is served by the care he bestows on the culture of the
land, but every comfort of himself and his family are the consequences
of it; and lastly, he is not obliged to convert his produce into money
to meet the rent-day. I am no political economist, but it strikes me
that it is a great burden on a poor man, that he must buy a certain
commodity in the shape of a legal tender, to satisfy the claim of a
landlord. Now, here the peasant has no such charge. The day of reckoning
divides the produce, and the "state of the currency" never enters into
the question. He has neither to hunt fairs nor markets, look out for
"dealers" to dispose of his stock, nor solicit a banker to discount his
small bill. All these are benefits, Tom, and some of them great ones
too. The disadvantages are that the capabilities of the soil are not
developed by the skilful employment of capital. The landlord will not
lay out money of which he is only to receive one-half the profit. The
peasant has the same motive, and has not the money besides. The result
is that Italy makes no other progress in agriculture than the skill
of an individual husbandman can bestow. Here are no Smiths of
Deanstown,--no Sinclairs,--no Mechis. The grape ripens and the olive
grows as it did centuries ago; and so will both doubtless continue to
do for ages to come. Again, there is another, and in some respects a
greater, grievance, since it is one which saps the very essence of all
that is good in the system. The contract is rarely a direct one between
landlord and tenant, but is made by the intervention of a third party,
who employs the laborers, and really occupies the place of oar middlemen
at home. The fellow is usually a hard taskmaster to the poor man, and a
rogue to the rich one; and it is a common thing, I am told, for a fine
estate to find itself at last in the hands of the _fattore_. This is a
sore complication, and very difficult to avoid, for there are so many
different modes of culture, and such varied ways of treating the crops
on an Italian farm, that the overseer must be sought for in some rank
above that of the peasant.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account