Historical fiction; Jerusalem -- Fiction; Jerusalem -- History -- Siege, 70 A.D. -- Fiction; Man-woman relationships -- Fiction
“Vespasian--if that be thy name--whatever project thou now hast in thy
mind, whether it be the enlargement of thy house, the augmentation of
thy lands, or the increase of thy slaves, the Fates are preparing for
thee a splendid seat, a large territory, a multitude of men.”[21]
The Roman officers, aware of the thought that was then paramount in the
mind of their general, looked significantly at each other.
“What is thy name?” asked Vespasian.
“What thine shalt be--Basilides.”
Now this name is, by interpretation, a king; and therefore Vespasian
was not a little startled to find this Phœnician seer hinting, and
that not obscurely, at the same high destiny assured him by Josephus.
Surely, since there had been no previous concert between them, that
must be true which was prophesied by Hebrew priest and by Phœnician
priest alike?
During the course of the long ride back to camp, Crispus had ample time
to review the incident that had just happened, and he saw in it not
the hand of the gods, but the trickery of man, the man in this case
being Titus, who by subtle devices was luring his father on to make an
attempt for the imperial throne.
Vespasian on the previous evening had announced his intention of
visiting Carmel on the morrow, and it had therefore been a very easy
matter for Titus to obtain the collusion of the priest Basilides for
the purpose of playing upon the superstitious feelings of Vespasian.
The sudden springing up of the flame upon the altar was a result easily
obtainable by concealing a grain of fat among the incense. Titus was
the real source of this “divine sign,” as well as of the ambiguous but
significant oracle delivered by Basilides.
Crispus hesitated whether to enlighten Vespasian as to how he was being
duped into believing himself to be a recipient of divine signs, but
finally resolved to hold his peace. What mattered it how Vespasian
was induced to revolt, whether by necessity, reason, or superstition,
so long as he _did_ revolt? The rule of Vespasian would be infinitely
preferable to that of the bestial Vitellius. And when Crispus, further
reflecting that should a Flavian dynasty be established, and should
Titus and Domitian--both at present childless--die without issue, the
next heir to the throne would be Flavius Clemens, an adherent of the
faith, he began to wonder whether a Christian Cæsar might not be among
the possibilities of the near future.
So here was Crispus wishing, like Berenice, to see Vespasian upon the
throne, though for a different reason--_she_ hoping to promote the
cause of Judaism, _he_ hoping to promote the cause of Christianity.
The course of the next few days furnished additional proof that subtle
art was being employed to make Vespasian accept a position almost akin
to that foretold of the Messiah.
“Do I look like a god?” said he with a caustic smile, entering the tent
of Rufus, who chanced to be alone.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account