The Draytons and the Davenants : $b A story of the Civil WarsCharles, Elizabeth Rundle
History
The Draytons and the Davenants : $b A story of the Civil Wars
Charles, Elizabeth Rundle
Great Britain -- History -- Civil War, 1642-1649 -- Fiction
"For instance, when Olive and Dr. Antony were betrothed, Mr. Drayton
led them into his room, and laid his hands on them, and blessed them.
And that was the seal of their betrothal. Every Sunday morning,
Olive tells me, when she and Roger were children, after family
prayers, they used to kneel thus for their father's blessing. Sacred
touches, holy as coronation sacring oil, I think, to bear about the
memory of through life. But then there is this to be remembered.
When the consecrating touch is from hands which work with us in daily
life, they need to be very pure. No pomp of place, and no mist of
distance glorifies the ministrant. He had need, indeed, to be all
glorious within.
"Family solemnities must be very true to be at all fair. I can fancy
Puritan hypocrisy, or a mere formal Puritanism, the driest and most
hideous thing in the world.
"Then as to symbols and sacred art. What else are these Scripture
texts, carved over door-ways, graven on chimney-stones, emblazoned on
walls? 'They are not graven images,' saith Mistress Dorothy. But
what are words but images within the soul, or images, rightly used,
but children's words? Not that even as to 'holy pictures' and
'images' they are quite destitute. What else are the paintings from
Scripture on the Dutch tiles in Mr. Drayton's room, where Olive and
Roger learned from Mistress Gretel's lips their earliest Bible lore?
It is true, they are chiefly from the Old Testament. But Adam and
Eve delving, the serpent darting out his forked tongue from the tree,
Noah and the animals walking out of the ark, are as much pictures as
St. Peter fishing, or the blessed Virgin and the Babe, on church
windows? What difference, then, except that the Puritan pictures are
on tiles at home instead of on glass at church? 'They are for
instruction, and not for idolatry,' saith Mistress Dorothy. But did
not the monks in old times paint their pictures also for instruction,
and not for idolatry? 'Centuries of abuse make the most innocent
things perilous,' saith Mistress Dorothy. 'When the brazen serpent
had become an idol, Jehoshaphat called it a piece of brass, and broke
it in pieces.' I can see something in that. The sacrilege, then, is
the idolatry, not in the destruction of the idol. But alas, if we
set ourselves to destroy all things that have been, or can be made
into idols, where are we to stop? Some people made idols of the very
stones of their houses, without any scriptures thereon, or of their
firesides, without the sacred pictures. There are two things,
however, which fill me with especial reverence in these Puritan ways.
First, this sweet and sacred family piety. Second, or rather first,
for it is at the root of all, the intense conviction that every man,
woman, and child, in every word and work, has to do directly with
God, and that he, by virtue of being divine, is nearer us than all
the creatures; that to Him each one is immediately responsible, and
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account