The Draytons and the Davenants : $b A story of the Civil WarsCharles, Elizabeth Rundle
History
The Draytons and the Davenants : $b A story of the Civil Wars
Charles, Elizabeth Rundle
Great Britain -- History -- Civil War, 1642-1649 -- Fiction
The Scottish covenanted congregations grew quickly indeed into a
covenanted army, and advanced to the border. The King, by Archbishop
Laud's counsel, disbelieving in the Covenant, proclaimed that if
within six weeks the Scotch did not renounce it, he would come and
chastise them (in a fatherly way) with an army. The King and
Archbishop Laud regarded the Covenant as a freak of rebellious
misguided children. The Scotch regarded it as the portion of the
eternal law of God which they then had to keep; and would keep, or
die.
A difference not to be settled by royal proclamation.
The Scotch had the advantage of _being_ their own army, ready to
fight for their Divine law; while the king had to pay his army with
the coin of the realm, and never could inspire them to the end with
the conviction that they were fighting for anything but coin of the
realm.
The coin of the realm, moreover, lay in the keeping of those dragons
called Parliaments, which his majesty had termed "vipers" at their
last meeting, and in a letter to Strafford, had compared to "cats,"
tameable when young, "cursed" if allowed to grow old, and which he
had therefore banished underground for eleven years into shadow and
silence.
When, therefore, the king and the Covenanted army met on the borders,
it was found that the Scotch, commanded, as my Father said, by old
Gustavus Adolphus's officers; every regiment as in that old Swedish
army, also a congregation, meeting morning and evening round its
banner of "Christ's crown and covenant," for prayer was a rock
against which the English army might vainly break; but from which, as
the event proved, it preferred to ebb silently away, the pay for
which only it professed to fight, being, moreover, exhausted.
The king took refuge in a treaty, promising to leave Kirk affairs in
the hands of the Kirk, and to call a free assembly. Poor gentleman,
his promises were still believed to have some small amount of truth
in them, and a pacification was effected.
Then came the moment of hope for those who had been watching those
movements with the intensest interest in England.
Of the two evils, a remonstrating Parliament in London and a fighting
Kirk in Scotland, the former now appeared to the king the least. In
the keeping of the Parliament, dragon-monster as it seemed to him,
lay the gold. And once more, after a silence of eleven years, on the
15th of April, 1640, the Parliament was summoned; a weapon welded by
the wrongs and the patience of eleven years into a temper the king
had done well to heed.
Pym and Hampden were the chief spokesmen, and Mr. Cromwell sat for
Huntingdon.
At the last Parliament they, and brave men like them, had wept bitter
tears at the king's arbitrary measures, and at his false dealing.
At this Parliament there were no tears shed. There were no
disrespectful or hasty words spoken.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account