The Early Christians in RomeSpence-Jones, H. D. M. (Henry Donald Maurice)
History
The Early Christians in Rome
Spence-Jones, H. D. M. (Henry Donald Maurice)
Church history -- Primitive and early church, ca. 30-600; Rome (Italy) -- Church history
One dominant thought seems to have haunted Hadrian--the longing for
death. Those who were nearest to his person, under the influence of
the wise prince his adopted successor, generally known as Antoninus
Pius, restrained him on several occasions from laying violent hands on
himself; but it was no avail, and Hadrian died at Baiæ, A.D.
138, the death no doubt hastened, if not absolutely caused, by his own
act.
The following little table will explain the succession of the Antonines
to the Empire:
_Hadrian_ first adopted Ælius Verus--a patrician, but a
voluptuous and carelessly living man; he died, however, in the
lifetime of Hadrian, leaving a son Verus, afterwards associated
in the Empire with Marcus, whom, however, he predeceased by many
years.
_Hadrian_ subsequently adopted as his successor Aurelius
Antoninus, known in history as Antoninus Pius.
_Antoninus Pius_ belonging to a Gallic family of Nîmes, had
filled the highest offices in the State, and later became a
trusted counsellor of the Emperor Hadrian, and his devoted
friend. He was a patrician of the highest character. When
Hadrian adopted him he required him to secure the imperial
succession by adopting Verus the son of Ælius Verus, whom he had
originally adopted but who had died, and also Marcus Aurelius
Antoninus, his young kinsman, a nephew of his (Hadrian’s) wife.
_Antoninus Pius_ became Emperor in A.D. 138. _Marcus
Aurelius Antoninus_ succeeded him in A.D. 161.
III
ANTONINUS PIUS, A.D. 138-A.D. 161
MARCUS ANTONINUS, A.D. 161-A.D. 180
After the death of Hadrian, in A.D. 138, for forty-two years
the Empire of Rome was ruled by two sovereigns who, pagan though they
were, live in the pages of historians of all lands as the most perfect
of any known sovereign rulers. They are known as the two Antonines: the
first is distinguished by the title given him by his contemporaries,
“Pius”; the second, by the best known of his several names, “Marcus
Aurelius.”
They were not conquerors, not even great legislators; although under
their beneficent, and with one sad exception generally wise rule,
the laws of the State, in the case especially of the downtrodden and
helpless, were materially improved and supplemented.
Our contemporary pagan literature here, alas! is but scanty; what has
come down to us is even more unsatisfactory than what we possess in the
contemporary records of Hadrian.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account