The early history of the HebrewsSayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
History
The early history of the Hebrews
Sayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
Bible. Old Testament -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.; Jews -- History -- To 953 B.C.
The clay tablets found by the fellahin were discovered on the site of
the Foreign Office of the ‘Heretic King,’ the bricks of which were each
stamped with the words ‘The Record Office of Aten-Ra.’[131] It adjoined
the palace, and we learn from a clay seal found among its ruins by
Professor Petrie that it was under the control of a Babylonian. This,
however, was not extraordinary, since the foreign correspondence of the
Pharaoh was carried on in the Babylonian language and the Babylonian
system of writing. In fact, the Tel el-Amarna tablets have shown that
the Western Asia conquered by the Egyptian kings of the eighteenth
dynasty was wholly under the domination of Babylonian culture. All over
the civilised Oriental world, from the banks of the Tigris and Euphrates
to those of the Nile, the common medium of literary and diplomatic
intercourse was the language and script of Chaldæa. Not only the writing
material, but all that was written upon it, was borrowed from Babylonia.
So powerful was this Babylonian influence, that the Egyptians themselves
were compelled to submit to it. In place of their own singular and less
cumbrous hieratic or cursive script, they had to communicate with their
Asiatic subjects and allies in the cuneiform characters and the
Babylonian tongue. Indeed, there is evidence that the memoranda made by
the official scribes of the Pharaoh’s court, at all events in Palestine,
were compiled in the same foreign speech and syllabary.[132] That the
Babylonian language and script were studied in Egypt itself we know from
the evidence of the Tel el-Amarna tablets. Among them have been found
fragments of dictionaries as well as Babylonian mythological tales. In
one of the latter certain of the words and phrases are separated from
one another in order to assist the learner.
The use of the Babylonian language and system of writing in Western Asia
must have been of considerable antiquity. This is proved by the fact
that the characters had gradually assumed peculiar forms in the
different countries in which they were employed, so that by merely
glancing at the form of the writing we can tell whether a tablet was
written in Palestine or in Northern Syria, in Cappadocia or Mesopotamia.
The knowledge of them, moreover, was not confined to the few. On the
contrary, education must have been widely spread; the Tel el-Amarna
correspondence was carried on, not only by professional scribes, but
also by officials, by soldiers, and by merchants. Even women appear
among the writers, and take part in the politics of the day. The
letters, too, are sometimes written about the most trivial matters, and
not unfrequently enter into the most unimportant details.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account