The early history of the HebrewsSayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
History
The early history of the Hebrews
Sayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
Bible. Old Testament -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.; Jews -- History -- To 953 B.C.
Meneptah II., the Pharaoh of the Exodus, thus refers at Karnak to the
arable land about Pi-Bailos, the modern Belbeis. ‘The country around
it,’ he says, ‘is not cultivated, but left as pasture for cattle because
of the foreigners. It has been abandoned (to them) since ancient times.’
They had settled with their herds in the neighbouring-valley of Tumilât,
and the richer land which adjoined the valley was also assigned to them.
Here they were in the nome of Heliopolis, the daughter of whose
high-priest was married by Joseph, as well as in the near neighbourhood
of Bubastis, where Dr. Naville has found Hyksos remains.
When the great inscription of Meneptah II. was engraved on the walls of
Karnak the Exodus would have already taken place. The ‘foreigners,’
therefore, to whom he alludes must have been the Israelites, who had now
deserted the spot. The district accordingly would once more have needed
inhabitants, and the Pharaoh had the power of handing it over to the
first Bedâwin tribe who begged for pasturage in the Delta. He had not
long to wait. Among the papyri in the British Museum there is a letter
dated in the eighth year of Meneptah’s reign, and addressed to the king.
In this the scribe writes as follows:—‘Another matter for the
consideration of my master’s heart. We have allowed the tribes of the
Shasu from the land of Edom to pass the fortress of Meneptah in the land
of Thukut (Succoth), (and go) to the lakes of Pithom of Meneptah in the
land of Thukut, in order to feed themselves, and to feed their herds on
the great estate of Pharaoh, the beneficent sun of all countries. In the
year 8.’[155]
The Wâdi Tumilât was accordingly regarded as crown-land, as indeed it is
to-day, and it was handed over to the Edomites by officers of the
Pharaoh, just as it had been to the Israelites several centuries before.
But now the Israelites had fled from it, and disappeared into the
wilderness, and it was necessary to fill their place.
The Biblical writer distinguishes the Pharaoh of the Oppression from the
Pharaoh of the Exodus (Exod. ii. 23). It was after the death of the
great royal builder of Egypt that the Hebrews were delivered from their
bondage. The Pharaoh of the Oppression and not the Pharaoh of the Exodus
was ‘the new king which knew not Joseph.’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account