The early history of the HebrewsSayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
History
The early history of the Hebrews
Sayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
Bible. Old Testament -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.; Jews -- History -- To 953 B.C.
It is true that the tariffs of Carthage and Marseilles belong to a late
period. But they embody regulations and usages which were common to the
Semitic world of Western Asia, as we may gather from a comparison of
them with the ritual of Babylonia, and which therefore must have been—at
least in substance—of great antiquity. Two conclusions result from this
fact. On the one hand the Levitical legislation cannot have been the
invention of the Exilic age, as some adventurous critics have believed;
on the other hand, it is based on customs and ideas which must have been
prevalent in Israel long before the birth of Moses. The Hebrew
legislator did but develop, modify, and define existing rites; the
Levitical Code is not a new creation, but a body of religious and ritual
laws which has been formed deliberately and with individual effort out
of older customs and habits of thought. Doubtless there are laws and
regulations which were the immediate creation of the lawgiver; from time
to time new cases arose for which special legislation was needed, and of
which the cases of Nadab and Abihu (Lev. x. 1-3), of the son of
Shelomith and the Egyptian (Lev. xxiv. 10-16), and of the daughters of
Zelophehad (Numb. xxvii. 1-11) are examples. To assume that such cases
originated in the laws which they illustrated, and not the reverse, is a
gratuitous supposition which is contradicted by the history of modern
European law.[212]
Whether the Day of Atonement, the Feast of Trumpets on the first of each
seventh month and the Year of Jubilee were also new creations of the
lawgiver, may be questioned. The special legislation connected with
them, as well as their association with the Exodus out of Egypt, was
certainly peculiar to the Levitical code, but the same is true of the
three older feasts of the Semitic calendar. These too were made to
illustrate the events of Israelitish history, and new regulations were
laid down for their observance. The Day of Atonement, however, had its
counterpart in Babylonia and Assyria. There also in periods of danger or
distress, days of humiliation and fasting were prescribed, and prayers
and offerings were made to the gods that they might forgive the sins of
the people. When at the beginning of Esar-haddon’s reign Assyria was
threatened by the Kimmerian invasion, ‘religious ordinances and holy
days’ were proclaimed by the priests for ‘a hundred days and a hundred
nights,’ and the sun-god was besought to remove the sin of his
worshippers.[213] So, again, after the suppression of the Babylonian
revolt, Assur-bani-pal tells us that ‘by the command of the prophets I
purified their sanctuaries and cleaned their streets which had been
defiled. Their wrathful gods and angry goddesses I tranquillised with
prayers and penitential hymns. Their daily sacrifice, which had been
discontinued, I restored in peace and established again as it had been
before.’ The Feast of Trumpets reminds us that in Babylonia the first
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account