The early history of the HebrewsSayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
History
The early history of the Hebrews
Sayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
Bible. Old Testament -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.; Jews -- History -- To 953 B.C.
southern Canaan taken by Ramses II. was Shalama or Salem. But if so,
there could have been no massacre of the population and burning of the
town; the passages of the Old Testament which describe the Jebusites as
living uninterruptedly in their city are too clear and definite to admit
of such a supposition. On the contrary, the Jebusites lived in peace and
harmony along with both Jews and Benjamites; and were it not for the
words of the Levite (Judg. xix. 11), that Jerusalem was still ‘the city
of a stranger,’ we could well believe that the fate which overtook it in
the time of David had been anticipated in an earlier century. But
neither Benjamin nor Judah could ‘drive out the Jebusites that
inhabited’ the great fortress-city of Southern Palestine.
The rise of Judah dated from the overthrow of Adoni-bezek, ‘Afterwards,’
we read, ‘the children of Judah went down to fight against the
Canaanites that dwelt in the mountain, and in the Negeb of the south,
and in the plain.’ It was all long subsequent to the death both of
Joshua and of Caleb. The last survivors of the first attempt to
penetrate into that part of Canaan had passed away before it at last
fell—if only partially—into Israelitish hands. The first dreams of
conquest had long since made way for a sober and disappointing reality.
Canaan had proved for Israel a more difficult prize to secure than
Britain proved for the Saxons. It was only in the mountains and a few
isolated cities that the invaders succeeded in holding their own.
Elsewhere the walls and chariots of the Canaanites kept them at bay,
while the strongholds of the Philistines and Phœnicians barred them from
the coast. The children of Israel were compelled to dwell ‘among the
Canaanites, Hittites, and Amorites, and Perizzites, and Hivites, and
Jebusites,’ and there was little cause for wonder that ‘they took their
daughters to be their wives, and gave their daughters to their sons, and
served their gods’ (Judg. iii. 5, 6).
Before Joshua died the tabernacle was set up at Shiloh, on the slopes of
Mount Ephraim, in the heart of the newly-conquered land. That the
central sanctuary should thus be under the protection of Ephraim was a
token that ‘the house of Joseph’ was paramount among the tribes of
Israel. A further token was the burial of the mummy of Joseph at
Shechem. Here, too, at Shechem were the two mountains Ebal and Gerizim,
on which the curses and the blessings of the Law had been ordered to be
pronounced. History has left no record of the conquest of the place, and
the name of the king of Shechem is not even found in the list of the
kings vanquished by Joshua. But the city must have fallen during the
early period of the invasion, and the narrative in Josh. viii. 33 would
imply that its capture followed closely upon the destruction of Ai.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account