The early history of the HebrewsSayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
History
The early history of the Hebrews
Sayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
Bible. Old Testament -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.; Jews -- History -- To 953 B.C.
The sign which gave Othniel the right to be a _Shophêt_ or ‘Judge’ was
twofold. ‘The spirit of Yahveh came upon him,’ and he delivered Israel
from its oppressor. The Shophêt was thus marked out by Yahveh for his
office, and his success in war was a visible token that he had been
called to be the leader of his people. The office was a peculiarly
Canaanitish institution. When Kingship was abolished at Tyre in the time
of Nebuchadrezzar, the kings were replaced by ‘Judges,’ and at Carthage
the ‘Sufetes’ or ‘Judges’ were the chief magistrates of the state.[295]
Whether the institution existed elsewhere in the Semitic world we do not
know. But it was as it were indigenous to the soil of Canaan, and in
submitting themselves to the rule of the Judges, the Israelites
submitted themselves at the same time to Canaanitish influence. It was a
step backward, a step towards absorption into the population around
them, and it is therefore not without reason that the period of the
Judges is a synonym for the period when the religion and manners of
Canaan were dominant among the Israelitish tribes. The Pentateuch
recognised the priest, the lawgiver, and the king; the judge was the
creation of an age in which the Baalim seemed to have gained the mastery
over Yahveh.
That the first of the Judges should have been of Edomite descent is a
striking commentary on what may be termed the catholicity of pre-exilic
Israel. It was not race so much as participation in the worship and
favour of Yahveh, that gave a right to be included among ‘the chosen
people.’ The ancestress of David was a Moabitess, and the Deuteronomic
law lays down that the children of an Edomite, or even of an Egyptian,
‘shall enter into the congregation of the Lord in their third
generation’ (Deut. xxiii. 7, 8).[296] A ‘mixed multitude’ accompanied
the Israelites in their flight from Egypt, and the Kenites, with whom
Moses was allied, shared like the Kenizzites in the conquest of Canaan.
Hebron, the future capital of Judah, and a Levitical city, was a
Kenizzite possession, and the Judah of later days was itself a mixture
of Israelitish and Edomite elements.
How far the authority of Othniel extended it is difficult to say. But
the fact that the enemy, whose yoke he had broken, was an invader from
the north makes it probable that his rule was acknowledged in Mount
Ephraim as well as among the northern tribes. That it was also
acknowledged on the east side of the Jordan there is no proof. Though
the Song of Deborah shows that the solidarity of Israel was recognised,
it also shows that this feeling of a common God and of a common history
had but little political effect. The eastern tribes lived apart from
those of the west, and the judges whom we hear of as rising among them
had purely local powers. Indeed, between Jephthah and the Ephraimites
there was internecine war.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account