The early history of the HebrewsSayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
History
The early history of the Hebrews
Sayce, A. H. (Archibald Henry)
Bible. Old Testament -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.; Jews -- History -- To 953 B.C.
“Why is his chariot so long in coming?
Why tarry the wheels of his cars?”
The wisest of her waiting-women answered her,
Yea, she returned answer to herself:
“Have they not found and divided the spoil,
A damsel or two to each man,
A spoil of many-coloured garments to Sisera,
A spoil of garments of many-coloured needlework,
Two garments of many-coloured needlework for the neck of the
spoiler.”[329]
So may all thine enemies perish, O Yahveh;
But may those who love him be as the rising of the sun in his
might!’
Of Barak and Deborah we hear no more. The next judge and deliverer who
appears upon the canvas is an Abi-ezrite of Manasseh, who came from the
northern borders of Ephraim between Ophrah and Shechem. His father was
Joash, the head, it would seem, of the clan. But he himself bears a
double name. It is as Gideon, the ‘cutter-down’ of his father’s idol,
that he is first introduced to us. In later history his name is
Jerubbaal. The latter name is said to have been given him because he had
thrown down the altar of Baal, and is interpreted to mean ‘Let Baal
plead against him.’[330] But the other Old Testament examples we have
met with of the interpretation of proper names may well make us hesitate
about accepting this. They are all mere plays upon words, mere ‘popular
etymologies,’ which have no claim to be regarded as history. Whether the
philology is that of an ancient Hebrew writer or of a modern critic, its
conclusions do not belong to the domain of the historian.
Jerubbaal signifies ‘Baal will contend,’ not ‘Baal will plead against
him,’ and therefore really has a meaning exactly the reverse of that
ascribed to it in the narrative. The name seems substantially identical
with that of Rib-Hadad, the governor of Phœnicia in the age of the Tel
el-Amarna tablets. Joash, the father of Jerubbaal, was a worshipper of
Baal, and consequently there was nothing strange in his calling his son
after his god. It is only as Jerubbaal that the future judge was known
to the generation that followed him,[331] and his successor in the
kingdom of Manasseh was called even in his own day ‘Abimelech the son of
Jerubbaal.’[332] It has been suggested that Jerubbaal and Gideon were
two different personages, whom tradition has amalgamated together,[333]
but double names of the kind were not unknown in Oriental antiquity.
Solomon himself also bore the name of Jedidiah (2 Sam. xii. 25), and
Gideon, ‘the cutter-down,’ was not an inappropriate epithet for the
conqueror of the Midianites. There was a good reason why the pious
Israelite of a later generation should shrink from admitting that one of
his national heroes had borne a name compounded with that of Baal.[334]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account