In the preceding chapter we discussed at length the nature of the
curriculum of the Irish monastic schools. Our conclusions were based
on the evidence supplied by an examination of the writings and
other material remains which attest their Irish authorship. Here we
shall attempt to determine the extent as well as the limitations of
Irish scholarship, and briefly indicate the influence which that
scholarship may reasonably claim to have exerted on the history of
mediæval education. As illustrations of types of Irish scholars who
attained eminence in a special field and yet displayed considerable
versatility we have selected five: Virgilius, Dicuil, Dungal, Sedulius
and Eriugena. These may fairly be considered as representing Irish
scholarship of the period at its best.[477] All except Virgilius belong
to the ninth century.
Virgilius, bishop of Salzburg (766–7–784–5 A.D.) whose name is a
latinised form of the Irish name Fearghal, was one of the few men
who in the eighth century cultivated the profane sciences.[478]
Indeed the age in which he lived was equally unfavourable to the
pursuit of science or to the encouragement of speculative thought, as
Virgilius found from experience. On one occasion, Boniface, the Papal
Legate, denounced him for promulgating false doctrines inasmuch as he
maintained that the sun and moon passed under the earth, and that there
must be inhabitants on the other side.[479] Boniface had a previous
dispute with Virgilius over a theological question in which the Pope
decided in favour of Virgilius. Either from ignorance of Astronomy or,
as some think, through pique, Boniface appears to have misrepresented
the real views of Virgilius so as to convey the impression that he
taught that there was another world and another sun and moon and
consequently other men who were not redeemed by Our Lord.[480] The
versions of Virgilius’ teaching which we have given would appear to
represent his real views on the subject. At any rate he seems to have
explained his doctrine to the satisfaction of the Pope; for we find no
further mention of the controversy and he retained his see until his
death in 784–5 A.D.[481] His teachings show that he must have held that
the world was spherical, though he was wrong in his theory that the sun
and stars revolved round the earth. Even this semi-correct theory was a
decided advance on contemporary views on astronomical matters and shows
that Virgilius was an original thinker on scientific subjects, or else
it argues for his acquaintance with Greek literature in which he may
have become familiar with the doctrine of Eudoxus and Eratosthenes, as
to the sphericity of the earth.[482] As Virgilius was bishop of Aghaboe
in Ireland before he went to the Continent, it is most improbable that
he received his education any place other than in an Irish monastic
school. Unlike many of the Irish scholars who went abroad the name of
Virgilius is recorded in the Irish annals, a circumstance which would
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account