The Earth's BeginningBall, Robert S. (Robert Stawell)
Science
The Earth's Beginning
Ball, Robert S. (Robert Stawell)
Krakatoa (Indonesia); Nebular hypothesis
This being so, why should we withhold from the sun of primitive days the
designation to which it seems to be so fully entitled? Why should we not
speak of it as a nebula? The application of the laws of heat has shown
that the great orb of day was once one of those numerous objects which
astronomers know as nebulæ, and perhaps it may not be too fanciful to
suppose that a trace of the primæval nebula still survives in what we
call the Solar Corona (Fig. 20).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHAPTER VIII.
THE EARTH’S BEGINNING.
The Earth to be Studied—A great Experiment—The Diamond Drill—A Boring
upwards of a Mile Deep—A Mechanical Feat—The Scientific Importance
of the Work—Increase of Temperature with the Depth—A special Form of
Thermometer—Taking the Temperature in the Boring—The Level of
Constant Temperature—The Rate of Increase of Temperature with the
Depth—One degree Fahrenheit for every Sixty-six Feet in
Depth—Temperatures at Depths above a Mile—Conclusions as to the Heat
at very great Depths—The Heat developed by Tidal Action—This will
not account for the Earth’s Internal Heat—The Earth must be
continually Cooling—Inferences from the incessant loss of Heat from
the Earth—The Earth’s Surface once Red-Hot, or Molten—The Earth must
have originated from a Nebula—The Earth’s Beginning.
IN the last chapter we endeavoured to ascertain what can be learned from
the radiation of the sun with regard to the history of the solar system.
In this chapter we shall not consider any body in the heavens, but the
condition of the earth itself. We have learned something of the history
of the solar system from the celestial bodies; we shall now learn
something about it in another way—from the condition of our globe at
depths far beneath our feet.
It will be convenient to commence by mentioning a remarkable experiment
which was made a few years ago. Though that experiment is of great
scientific interest, yet it was not designed with any scientific object
in view. Not less than £10,000 was expended on the enterprise, and
probably so large a sum has never been expended on a single experiment
of which the sole object was to add to scientific knowledge. In the
present case the immediate object in view was, of course, a commercial
one. There was, it may be presumed, reasonable expectation that the
great initial cost, and a handsome profit as well, would be returned as
the fruits of the enterprise. Whether the great experiment was
successful from the money-making point of view does not now concern us,
but it does concern us to know that the experiment was very successful
in the sense that it incidentally afforded scientific information of the
very highest value.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account