+-------------+----------+---------+---------+-------+--------+ | | Stopped working on | Stopped tilling one part | | | their farms. | of their farms. | +-------------+----------+---------+----------------+---------+ | | | | With 1 horse. | | | | | +---------+------+ | | | | In the | All | All | In the | | | |district |“stopped”|with 1|district | | |Horseless,|at large,| _etc._ |horse |at large,| | Districts. |per cent. |per cent.| = 100. |= 100.|per cent.| +-------------+----------+---------+---------+------+---------+ |Zadonsk | 95 | 25 | 73 | 13 | 7 | |Korotoyak | 95 | 15 | 62 | 16 | 8 | |Nizhnedevitsk| 96 | 13 | 65 | 27 | 13 | +-------------+----------+---------+---------+------+---------+ As shown by these figures, the percentage of householders who are unable to till the full size of their farms is twice as large among those with one horse as in the region at large; moreover, this transitional class of weak householders consists chiefly of those with one horse. [102] _Districts._ _“Horseless,” _With 1 horse, _In all, per cent._ per cent._ per cent._ _Gubernia of Voronezh_-- Zadonsk 25 40 65 Korotoyak 13 32 45 Nizhnedevitsk 13 32 45 _Gubernia of Ryazañ_-- Ranenburg 36 27 63 Dankoff 34 25 59 [103] The following tables are fully conclusive as regards the rise and growth of this class: I. CLASSIFICATION ACCORDING TO THE NUMBER OF ADULT MALE WORKERS TO ONE HOUSEHOLD (TOTAL IN EVERY CLASS = 100.)