The Economics of the Russian VillageHourwich, Isaac A. (Isaac Aaronovich)
History
The Economics of the Russian Village
Hourwich, Isaac A. (Isaac Aaronovich)
Agricultural laborers -- Russia; Land tenure -- Russia; Mir; Peasants; Thesis (Ph. D.)
Estates | 123 | 90223| 85.4| 734 | 67 |19391 | 73.4| 289
with large | | | | | | | |
agriculture| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Management | 6 | 556| 0.5| .. | 5 | 1060 | 4.0| ..
not stated | | | | | | | |
+--------+------+-----+--------+--------+------+-----+--------
Total | 185 |105515|100 | 576 | 94 |26438 |100 | 281
-----------+--------+------+-----+--------+--------+------+-----+--------
The nobility has proved able to farm only on the largest estates. Where
the nobleman would merely distribute his estate in small lots among
peasant tenants, the capitalist landholder carries on agriculture on a
large scale:
_Dessiatines._
Average holding of a noble in small peasant tenure 273
Average holding of a capitalist with farming on a large scale 289
The average holding on which peasant tenure pays the capitalist better
than farming, is less than one-half the corresponding size of a noble’s
estate. Accordingly we find that wherever the capitalist has replaced
the noble, the exclusive practice of small peasant tenure has lost over
one-half of its area:
_Estates in small peasant tenure._ _Percentage in the area._
Property of the nobility 13.4
Property of the capitalists 6.3
Among the capitalists we notice the timber speculator, who purchases
tracts without ploughland, or, perhaps, sells the latter to the small
farmer. Yet, with all that, three-fourths of the total area acquired by
the capitalist class are farmed by the owners. Practical business men
who invest their money in large estates, would undoubtedly prefer to
quietly pocket the enormous rents paid by the peasants, if in reality
agriculture on a large scale had proved a loss, as both the nobility
and the peasantists claimed.[169]
Moreover, the management of the estates by the capitalists is far
superior to that which the noble landlord could afford.
The capitalist would manure his fields as soon as his holding reaches
scarcely one-half the average estate on which the nobleman would
care to fertilize the soil; and even then the latter lags behind the
capitalist as regards the area yearly manured:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account