[Footnote 1: Bremer, _The Homes of the New World_, vol. ii., p. 499.] [Footnote 2: _Ibid._, p. 491; Burke, _Reminiscences of Georgia_, p. 85.] [Footnote 3: Kemble, _Journal_, etc., p. 34.] [Footnote 4: _Special Report of the U.S. Com. of Ed._, 1871, p. 340.] The city Negroes of Virginia continued to maintain schools despite the fact that the fear of servile insurrection caused the State to exercise due vigilance in the execution of the laws. The father of Richard De Baptiste of Fredericksburg made his own residence a school with his children and a few of those of his relatives as pupils. The work was begun by a Negro and continued by an educated Scotch-Irishman, who had followed the profession of teaching in his native land. Becoming suspicious that a school of this kind was maintained at the home of De Baptiste, the police watched the place but failed to find sufficient evidence to close the institution before it had done its work.[1] [Footnote 1: Simmons, _Men of Mark_, p. 352.] In 1854 there was found in Norfolk, Virginia, what the radically proslavery people considered a dangerous white woman. It was discovered that one Mrs. Douglass and her daughter had for three years been teaching a school maintained for the education of Negroes.[1] It was evident that this institution had not been run so clandestinely but that the opposition to the education of Negroes in that city had probably been too weak to bring about the close of the school at an earlier date. Mrs. Douglass and her pupils were arrested and brought before the court, where she was charged with violating the laws of the State. The defendant acknowledged her guilt, but, pleading ignorance of the law, was discharged on the condition that she would not commit the same "crime" again. Censuring the court for this liberal decision the _Richmond Examiner_ referred to it as offering "a very convenient way of getting out of the scrape." The editor emphasized the fact that the law of Virginia imposed on such offenders the penalty of one hundred dollars fine and imprisonment for six months, and that its positive terms "allowed no discretion in the community magistrate."[2] [Footnote 1: Parsons, _Inside View of Slavery_, p. 251; and Lyman, _Leaven for Doughfaces_, p. 43.] [Footnote 2: _13th Annual Report of the American and Foreign Antislavery Societies_, 1853, p. 143.]