The Educational Writings of Richard MulcasterMulcaster, Richard
History
The Educational Writings of Richard Mulcaster
Mulcaster, Richard
Education -- History
I begin at the subject of correct writing, because reading, which
is the first elementary study, must be directed both in precept and
practice according to the way that the thing which is to be read
is written or printed. And considering that the correct writing of
our tongue is still in question, some, who are too far in advance,
esteeming it quite unfit, some, who are too far behind, thinking
it perfect enough, some, who have the soundest opinion, judging it
to be on the whole well appointed, though in certain particulars
requiring to be improved, is it not a very necessary labour to fix
the writing, so that the reading may be sure? Now, in examining the
correct method of our writing, I begin at that which the learned
tongues used, to find out what was right for themselves, when they
were in the same position in which ours now is. For all tongues
keep one and the same rule for their main development, though each
has its special features. In this way I shall be able to answer all
those objections which charge our writing with either insufficiency
or confusion, and also to examine, as by a sure touchstone, all
the other supplements which have been devised heretofore to help
our writing, by either altering the old characters, or devising
some new, or increasing their number. For if the other tongues
that have been so highly esteemed, when they were subject to, and
charged with, these same supposed wants with which our writing
is now burdened, delivered themselves by other means than either
altering, or superseding, or increasing their characters, and
made use of their own material, why should we seek means that are
strange and not in keeping with our language when we have such a
pattern to perfect our writing by so well-warranted a precedent?
That the finest tongue was once quite rude is proved by the very
course of nature, which proceeds from weakness to strength, from
imperfection to perfection, from a low degree to a high dignity.
What means, then, did those languages use, which have won the
opinion of being correctly written, to come by the method that
produced that opinion? There are two considerations in regard to
speech concerning the way that has been followed in its refining.
For if we look into the first degree of refining, before which no
tongue at all had any beauty in the pen, we have to consider how
the very first language proceeded from her first rudeness to her
fullest perfection. Again, we have to consider how other secondary
languages have improved and purified themselves by following the
same method as that used by the primitive tongue.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account