1. _King in Tau-urit_ ⁂⁂⁂⁂⁂⁂⁂. Osiris is also called ⁂⁂⁂⁂⁂⁂⁂ at Philæ. And in the second line of this chapter he is called ⁂⁂⁂ _in Tau-urit_ which, if not identical with Abydos, must have been a part of that town or in its immediate neighbourhood. 2. ⁂⁂⁂⁂⁂⁂⁂⁂ is equivalent to ⁂⁂⁂, the title of Osiris in _Pepi I_, line 8. And the Power is defined as ⁂⁂⁂⁂⁂⁂⁂⁂⁂⁂ “thy Power which is upon the Glorified.” 3. _Administration_ ⁂; literally _things_. See note 3 on Chapter 18. 4. _Utterances_ ⁂⁂. See note 2 on Chapter 1, and compare _Merenrā_, 103, and _Pepi II_, 13. 5. _Coming forth_ ⁂. _Cf._ ϣⲁⲓ, ἀνατέλλειν, ἀνατολὴ, and the meanings ἐξοδεία and ἑορτή, which, on the tablet of Canopus, correspond to the Egyptian ⁂. The first hour after sunrise was called ⁂⁂⁂⁂; so that “the beautiful Coming forth of thy Powers” may be a mere technical periphrasis for daybreak. Besides the ⁂⁂⁂⁂⁂ of Rā in Chapter 17, it is well to remember such proper names as ⁂⁂⁂⁂, ⁂⁂⁂, ⁂⁂⁂⁂⁂, ⁂⁂⁂⁂, ⁂⁂⁂⁂, ⁂⁂⁂⁂ and ⁂⁂⁂, with several others. 6. _Thine associate god_, or _one of those about thee_, ⁂⁂⁂⁂⁂. See Note 2 on Chapter 18. M. Chabas in his commentary upon the fine hymn translated by him in the _Rev. Arch._, 1857, considers it “une circonstance bizarre” that Osiris is several times included among his ‘_Djadjou_.’ The _bizarrerie_ is easily explained by parallel expressions known to every Greek scholar, οἱ ἀμφὶ Πεισίστρατον in Herodotus means _Pisistratus with his troops_, and in Thucydides, οἱ περι Θρασυβουλον means _Thrasybulus with his soldiers_. In the Iliad (3, 146) οἱ ἀμφὶ Πρίαμον is explained by the Scholiast as meaning _Priam himself_: τοῦτ ἐστιν, ὁ Πρίαμος. 7. This passage as it stands is the alteration of one of the Pyramid Texts (Teta, 284; Pepi I, 54): “Horus hath brought to pass that _his Ka_ [? image] which is in thee should unite with thee in thy name of Ka-hotep.” 8. This whole passage is also taken from the Pyramid Texts. Its chief value in this place is in evidence of a truth not yet generally acknowledged by Egyptologists, that _Ap-uat_ (or as written in the Pyramid Texts, _Up-uat_) is really Osiris. The proofs are numerous and overwhelming. I produced evidence of this identity in the P.S.B.A. of June 1, 1886, from an obelisk of the XIIth dynasty now at Alnwick Castle, and in 1891 Brugsch published in his _Thesaurus_ (p. 1420) a tablet, now in the Louvre, of the same period as the obelisk, which also treats Ap-uat as one of the names of Osiris. But the earliest as well as the most instructive evidence is that of the Pyramid Texts. The later form of it is thus given on the coffin of _Nes-Shu-Tefnut_ at Vienna (see Bergman, _Recueil_, VI, p. 165): “Horus openeth for thee thy Two Eyes that thou mayest see with them in thy name of Ap-uat.”