The Egyptian campaigns, 1882 to 1885Royle, Charles
History
The Egyptian campaigns, 1882 to 1885
Royle, Charles
Egypt -- History -- British occupation, 1882-1936; Sudan -- History
"The families betake themselves to the landing-place. Captain
Fitz-Roy opposes their departure.[47] I then write him a
letter. M. Fitz-Roy answers me verbally at seven in the
evening, when the night commences, that the families are free,
but that M. de Lesseps and all his _personnel_ shall pass the
night in the town, for he expects to be attacked. There will be
a battle in Ismailia, and he wishes that M. de Lesseps and all
his _personnel_ should be there. 'I am the master, now,' says
he.
"These odious words were quite gratuitous, since M. de Lesseps
and all the _personnel_, chiefs and employés, had declared that
they would not go out of the town, and there had never been a
question except as regards their families.
"A part of the families preferred to return to town; the other
part was enabled to embark in the boats sent by the ironclad
Spanish frigate _Carmen_, and by the Austrian gunboat
_Albatross_.
"The night, happily, passed without any incident; the silence
was broken only by the shells thrown by the _Carysfort_ and
_Orion_ on Nefiché. At daylight Ismailia woke up in the midst
of several thousands of English soldiers of the army. The Lake
is full of transports and ships of war.
"We learn then that in the night of the 19th to the 20th the
English have disembarked at Port Saïd, but peaceably, and that
Admiral Hoskins has taken possession of our offices, from
whence M. Desavary, Principal Transit Agent at Port Saïd, had
been expelled. Ships of war and transports entered the Canal
without pilots, and without paying their dues.[48]
"During the 20th and 21st the movement without pilots of the
English vessels of war gave rise to complete confusion. The
greater part got ashore, and several were obliged to disembark
their troops on the bank before arriving at Ismailia, being
incapable of extricating themselves by their own resources.
Admiral Seymour has been forced to recognize this, and the
hurry that he was in on the 21st to hand back the working to us
is the proof of it.[49]
"It is desirable to add that the British naval authorities
tried to obtain the services of several of our pilots behind
the backs of their superiors, and that all the pilots, without
exception, refused to move without the order of the Company.
"During all this crisis no _défaillance_ has been produced in
all the _personnel_ from Port Saïd to Suez. The Company may
well be proud of it."
The substance of M. Victor de Lesseps' account of the occupation of
Ismailia being telegraphed to the _Standard_ newspaper, the Lords of the
Admiralty thought the matter of sufficient importance to be noticed, and
on the 1st September communicated to the Foreign Office as follows:--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account