The electron, its isolation and measurement and the determination of some of its propertiesMillikan, Robert Andrews
Philosophy
The electron, its isolation and measurement and the determination of some of its properties
Millikan, Robert Andrews
Electrons
Now, it is a piece of rare good fortune for the testing of this theory
that radium actually does eject negative electrons with speeds which
can be accurately measured and which do vary from three-tenths up to
ninety-eight hundredths of that of light. It is further one of the
capital discoveries of the twentieth century[137] that within
these limits the observed rate of variation of the mass of the negative
electron with speed agrees accurately with the rate of variation
computed on the assumption that this mass is all of electrical
origin. Such is the experimental argument for the electrical origin
of mass.[138]
Solving then equation (32) for , we find that the radius of the
sphere over which the charge of the negative electron would
have to be distributed to have the observed mass is but
, or but one fifty-thousandth of the
radius of the atom (). From this point of view,
then, the negative electron represents a charge of electricity which is
condensed into an exceedingly minute volume. In fact, its radius cannot
be larger in comparison with the radius of the atom than is the radius
of the earth in comparison with the radius of her orbit about the sun.
In the case of the positive electron there is no direct experimental
justification for the assumption that the mass is also wholly of
electrical origin, for we cannot impart to the positive electrons
speeds which approach the speed of light, nor have we as yet found in
nature any of them which are endowed with speeds greater than about
[Pg 189]
one-tenth that of light. But in view of the experimental results
obtained with the negative electron, the carrying over of the same
assumption to the positive electron is at least natural. Further, if
this step be taken, it is clear from equation (32), since for
the positive is nearly two thousand times larger than for the
negative, that for the positive can be only ¹⁄₂₀₀₀ of what it is
for the negative. In other words, the size of the positive electron
would be to the size of the negative as a sphere having a two-mile
radius would be to the size of the earth. From the standpoint, then,
of the electromagnetic theory of the origin of mass, the dimensions
of the negative and positive constituents of atoms in comparison with
the dimensions of the atoms themselves are like the dimensions of the
planets and asteroids in comparison with the size of the solar system.
All of these computations, whatever their value, are rendered possible
by the fact that is now known.
Now we know from methods which have nothing to do with the
electromagnetic theory of the origin of mass, that the excessive
minuteness predicted by that theory for both the positive and the
negative constituents of atoms is in fact correct, though we have no
evidence as to whether the foregoing ratio is right.
III. DIRECT EXPERIMENTAL PROOF OF THE EXCESSIVE
MINUTENESS OF THE ELECTRONIC CONSTITUENTS
OF ATOMS
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account